Many are dubious, but the numbers add up
Excerpt from this story from Sierra Club:
It’s a few hours before dawn in early January 2018. A black pickup races through the darkness of an upscale neighborhood in Cincinnati and pulls up next to a Queen Anne–style home. Four guys leap out, toting a portable stretcher. They jog silently past the darkened windows to the backyard, where Tony DeNicola waits, mud-encrusted boots planted in the manicured grass, a dart gun slung across one shoulder. At his feet lies a female white-tailed deer, legs splayed, eyes shut, tongue lolling to one side. The faint buzz of a snore escapes from her lips.
Soon, a team of veterinarians will slice open her belly, remove her ovaries, staple her up, tag her ear, and then call for the transport team to take her back to the neighborhood.
Sterilization sounds like a crazy way to address the problem of deer overpopulation, which many US cities and suburbs are struggling with. (Some areas of Cincinnati, for example, have 150 deer per square mile, compared with 20 per square mile for a healthy natural ecosystem.) But DeNicola’s efforts seem to be working. His doe sterilization program has been going on in a corner of the city since 2015, and so far the numbers look good. Based on records from the first three years of operation, DeNicola has documented a 19 percent decline in the deer population. That’s in keeping with data he has gathered from four other sites around the country that saw major drops after three years of doe sterilization: 34 percent in Cayuga, New York, 20 percent in Fairfax, Virginia, 47 percent on the National Institute of Health campus in Bethesda, Maryland, and 37 percent in a gated community in San Jose, California.










