Pounded In The Butt By A Metaphor For The Ways I Am Already Pounded In The Butt In Real Life by Ursula C. Le Guingle
seen from China
seen from China
seen from China
seen from Germany
seen from China
seen from China

seen from Germany
seen from Chile

seen from Canada
seen from Canada
seen from Germany
seen from Sri Lanka

seen from Hong Kong SAR China

seen from Germany
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Germany
seen from Russia
seen from United States
seen from China

seen from Netherlands
Pounded In The Butt By A Metaphor For The Ways I Am Already Pounded In The Butt In Real Life by Ursula C. Le Guingle
We are unavoidably parts of things bigger than ourselves (eg. Families, towns), and those things in turn are parts of bigger things (eg. Ethnicities, States). We as individuals are component parts of the upper spheres, but inconsequential individually. As individuals, we are dependent on our protective spheres to avoid intentional and unintentional harm from competing spheres that view us as vermin or as containing atoms that can be put to better uses. Some higher spheres function by minimizing the importance of lower spheres within them. Conflicts between spheres may kill many individuals, either directly via eg. war and indirectly via eg. famine.
Studying = notes on the table with a red pen in one hand and my phone open to tumblr mobile in the other.
im sure this has been said before but theres a line between something being perveived as “cool” vs “cringe” and that line is whether the person doing it is attractive
I have a nested partner and non-nested partner and these are my thoughts/philosophy/practice around hierarchy exactly.
A Complicated V-S Question
Which would you say?
What follows is scenes of crisis
What follow are scenes of crisis
My local linguistics professor (aka "Dad") had these thoughts. "What follow(s)" is a noun clause, and we expect the one at the front of the sentence to dictate the verb's number (singular or plural). This "what," though, refers to "scenes of crisis," which is plural; you could rewrite this sentence as
Scenes of crisis are what follow.
The desired focus is achieved via a movement transformation. There are others, and the verb agrees with the resulting predicate nominative:
Happy is the man who knows his own mind.
Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their country.
Gone are the days of waiting until the reference desk was open.
The linguist's final assessment: "I would say 'What follow are,' but I sympathize with someone who wants to use 'What follows is.'"