#devs (2020)

[a-typical]

In Devs, the onset golden quantum computer prop was a practical build and quite substantial, weighing approximately half a ton. The onset design referenced real Quantum computer systems from companies such as IBM, and Google, except in the real world, the ‘chandelier’ would be encased in a cooling box since most of the gold apparatus one sees is related to cooling the quantum computer not any actual computation. “It was massive, but all of that quantum computer is practical. That prop should now be in an art gallery. It was stunning,” says Whitehurst.

The majority of the visual effects were created by DNEG in London which has a long history in dealing with Sc-Fi content with respect and tremendous visual fidelity. Films such as Inception and Interstellar have gained the company both Oscars and genuine respect from the science community.

[bouquinteim]

the v was a u this whole time?!?!?

[a-typical]

In some respects, one can think of a quantum computer today as being analogous to an analog computer from years ago. The cooling is key to reduce energy and thus vibration in the system. If a quantum computer is run for too long the processor heats up and the noise in the results increases. So sensitive is the computer to heat or vibration that at the $150 million Nanoscience Hub at Sydney University, scientists have to use stairs rather than the lifts because the quantum computer would feel the vibration of the lifts in the building and produce meaningless results. Thus in Devs, the quantum computer main lab space is depicted as a suspended hovering isolated block, inside a bunker style building. This art directed visual feature, like so many in Devs, had one foot in reality and another in fiction.

[a-typical]

The art direction of the exterior of the inner cube in Devs is based on a Menger Sponge, a complex three-dimensional fractal that illustrates infinite recursive patterns (a mathematical object). “The story of that really goes back to Annihilation (2018) and obviously there’s a lot of fractal imagery in that film, especially Mandelbrot,” Whitehurst comments referring to Director Alex Garland’s previous film.

“That film was still in the back of everybody’s mind… I cannot recall whether the actual screenplay describes the cube as being a Menger Sponge or not? But certainly, I don’t think there was ever any discussion of it being anything else.” The horizontal midsection was built on a set in Manchester and DNEG extended it up and down digitally.  On the set, there was also a large trolly that could be pulled back and forth to provide the basis of the capsule that floats across the gap. “Everything above and below that was a very elaborate set extension. Because the lighting is changing the whole time, it was incredibly complicated to do,” explains Whitehurst. The only exception is the major capsule drop in the finale. “That crash is all CG because it had to be,” he explains. “Even for the fully CG shots, wherever we could, we’d get Rob (Hardy : DOP) to operate some sort of camera move to give us something to work with. In those rare cases where we couldn’t do that,” says Whitehurst. “I’ve known Rob long enough that I think I can do a recently good Rob Hardy impersonation of moving a CG camera around!” Hardy and Whitehurst, have both worked many times with Director Garland.

[vortahoney]

Everything is fine and then episode five of devs

[blackqueercharacters]

Janet Mock as Senator Laine

Appears in two episodes of the Hulu miniseries Devs.

[swamp-cats-den]

I have lots of praise for the Devs series:

ideas: interesting

cinematography: stunning

dialogues:

music: mesmerizing

Ok, most of the dialogues were pretty good, but sometimes they'd go and say things like 'tech companies are bad cause they have too much power!' or 'instagram makes you feel shitty!'. Thanks, I get it, subtlety is not your forte.

It's not that the social commentary was bad, just awkward and superficial (although, I have to admit I liked Lyndon calling Forest not a tech genius, but an entrepreneur, and Forest being so self-assured he didn't care about scientific facts). I just think that Alex Garland is better at telling stories visually, and his strength lies more in creating an ambience fitted for his big ideas than writing characters or conversations. Other than that, it was quite an original and enjoyable show.

[5050withcristobal]

I'm 25 minutes into the first episode of Devs and quick question, what in the FUCK is going on?