orangeccreamsicles replied to your post: orangeccreamsicles replied to your post: ...
Oh my god, noo. That’s not where it goes either!
seen from Poland

seen from Australia
seen from United States
seen from Ukraine
seen from China
seen from United States

seen from Canada
seen from South Korea
seen from United States
seen from Brunei
seen from China
seen from Russia

seen from Uzbekistan
seen from Philippines
seen from Australia
seen from Türkiye

seen from United States

seen from Colombia
seen from Sweden
seen from United States
orangeccreamsicles replied to your post: orangeccreamsicles replied to your post: ...
Oh my god, noo. That’s not where it goes either!
while i think a lot of what my room mate does is an underhanded attempt to upset me, im also aware she’s not that smart
I think the only thing “romantic” as a suffix (objectum-romantic, machine-romantic, ...salarian-romantic) means to Me is “I have a strong attraction to and affection for this thing/being but I don’t really care if it’s reciprocal, and in fact, it’s probably easier if it’s not reciprocal, because maybe their idea of ‘romantic’ is different from Mine and requires more from Me than I’m able to offer, so it’s easier for everyone involved this way”.
Which... is probably why I like machines and salarians, both of which are canonically non-romantic and non-sexual.
icouldbepackstiles replied to your post: ooc; What do you call a d...
no eye deer
...!!!!!!!!!!!