There are so many visual resources for determining the credibility of sources & making good decisions about what kinds of information to share. What I appreciate about this infographic from NewseumED is that it doesn’t look like it was designed for children—although both the content & design seem accessible enough to work for a wide range of purposes & audiences.
I like flowcharts because they’re interactive & immediately understandable thanks to the use of simple questions, a basic yes/no system, and then a final answer. In this case, the “answers” are emoji that indicate whether the information is worth sharing. The use of green, yellow, and red to indicate facial expressions (smiling, neutral, frowning) also makes sense as U.S. culture associates those colors with specific actions (green=go).
The chunking of information, use of simple shapes (circles and squares), light gray background, sans serif fonts, repetition of colors to associate different content in the flowchart with content in the right column, & alignment all work together to make this document easy to use. Sometimes infographics are structured into different sections, which can result in a fragmented design. The vertical line of square enclosures on the right side of the page extend all the way down the page, connecting the different elements of this infographic. The repetition of colors, fonts, and shapes also helps with this.
[img description: Infographic from NewseumED titled “Is This Story Share-Worthy?” includes an introduction to the purpose of the chart (“[N]ot every story is worth your text, tweet or share. This chart can help you find the good stuff and get rid of the garbage”), followed by a flow chart that leads the viewer through the following questions: Is it real? Is it well-made? Is it news or opinion? Is it supported by facts? Is it biased? Is the bias open or sneaky? Does it entertain and/or raise awareness? Depending on whether the answers are yes or no, you are led to a green smiley face (tagged as “definitely share-worthy,” a yellow neutral face (“maybe share-worthy,” and a red frown face (“probably not share-worthy”). On the right side of the page are seven boxes that correspond with the questions in the flowchart and adopt the color of each question for ease of use. Each square enclosure includes a brief description with a few prompting questions and advice, e.g., “Is it real?” is followed by, “Does the EVIDENCE hold up? Is the SOURCE legitimate? Run a search for the source name and key facts, people or images from the story to weed out the fakes.”]