Hey I saw the aggressive responses you got to your tradesman Jason post and I just wanted to say I support you. I'm a working class person who got enough scholarships to study anything, but I could never in good conscience choose anything other than an useful, money making degree. However, middle class people can't seem to grasp it's not simply a matter of having or not having the money.
Yeahhhh I have no idea what that was about. XD Honestly I don’t care what other people do? I myself don’t like the concept of college either for myself or as an inherent moral bastion, for perfectly logical reasons like its monopoly and overpricing and the social stigma and hyped-up emotionalism that surrounds it……which I think that reaction you’re referring to kind of summed it up nicely and proved my point for me. XD
But yeah, I really don’t care what other people choose to do for college, but I feel like any decision you make you should be responsible enough to accept the consequences of. Like, if I wind up skipping college—or at least not getting a degree—I’m not going to constantly complain that I don’t have one because I chose not to get one. Whereas I could fill a book on this site alone, let alone in real life, with people who chose free and clear to go to college and take out loans, who are OUTRAGED that they have to pay them back and the jobs they thought they’d get don’t exist. What really gets me is the fact that they sometimes twist it in their own heads so that their lack of a job is on everyone else for failing to realize how “”“valuable”“” college is, rather than on….I don’t know, supply and demand? Which is basic economics??? (((Which apparently they didn’t teach in college???)))
And yeah the fact that I was accused of “classism” for it is hilarious because 1. I’m middle class (and my family’s unemployed and not so well off right now, despite higher-education.) 2. Implying that Ivy Leagues are inherently better than normal colleges is actually kind of classist because most normal people cannot and will not ever get the chance to go to an Ivy League and the statistical majority of the country did not attend an Ivy League, so you’re classifying a huge amount of flyover country as stupid and irrelevant. Plus, Ivy Leagues ARE inherently more expensive: a year at community college is roughly $3,000, a year at a state university in the state you live in is roughly $5,000, and a state university in another state goes up to $21,000 a year. Ivy Leagues are even more than that, for an education you could get the equivalent of somewhere cheaper, and a degree that (unless you choose really wisely and measure up) will never make enough money to justify the cost.
And I never said people can’t go to Ivy Leagues, just that as a general rule a person of normal means will not get in or would not go because of a lack of resources. Aside from that, education is not a competition or race-to-the-top, and maybe it’s just because I’m a non-competitive person, but I don’t see why anyone should have to get into an Ivy League to “prove” that they’re smart. Smart is as smart does. Your brains are your own business, what you choose to do with your brains is your business, and what other people choose to do with theirs is not your business. Who the frick goes around declaring themselves the arbiter of intelligence based off of college or job? That’s a stupid, simplistic, and frankly utilitarian way to look at the world and I won’t stand for it. So. If that gets me callout posts, boo frickin hoo. XD
anyway rant mostly over (for now)









