elegantwitchcupcake replied to your post “Just a late night thought, but I wonder if archaeologists and...”
There are odd things in anthropology, being a sensible crazy loki loving archaeologist, fire God has turned up a lot since 1700s, but there is a whole team of post 1400 written down loki fire stuff, not to mention Iceland and volcanos, so, fire God not really, fire association yes. Personally loki has been involved in blessing sacred fires before, but that's me. The word 'of' is the problem.
I totally agree, and I think you’re onto something with the blessing of sacred fires. My Danish-American friend who grew up Heathen once mentioned Loki is considered a facilitator of offering because of his eating contest with the fire-Jotun, Logi. In my friend’s tradition, fire plays an important role in just about everything, including burning offerings.
But fire association doesn’t beget Fire God. It would be like saying Thor the God of Goats because he has two magic goats, despite the fact animal husbandry isn’t a defining function of his.
I’m currently working through Arith Härger’s newest video on Loki where he supports the idea of Loki being a full-fledged god of fire. I respect Arith; he’s one of the few Heathen scholars I know who has a goddamn brain in his head, so it’s possible he’ll take this in a direction I haven’t seen yet. But I’m not holding my breath about it.






















