The Trace of Enlightenment , by Ary Prananto Hastono. * * * * *
SPIRIT
Spirit is Life It flows thru the death of me endlessly like a river unafraid of becoming the sea.
–Gregory Corso
seen from France
seen from Switzerland
seen from United States
seen from Italy
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Russia
seen from United States
seen from China

seen from United States

seen from Sweden
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from Switzerland

seen from Belgium
seen from United Kingdom
seen from France

seen from Russia
seen from Lithuania
The Trace of Enlightenment , by Ary Prananto Hastono. * * * * *
SPIRIT
Spirit is Life It flows thru the death of me endlessly like a river unafraid of becoming the sea.
–Gregory Corso
I have no more--
poetry for You.
Now? I only
have me. You, who likes to
think You were
always doing the
right thing. You, who
masks any and all emotion, any
unwanted turmoil, and tells me
I am not mature for the
real maturity I've cultivated in
speaking my Truths, in learning
again how to feel.
My truths are not always pretty, and
neither are my feelings.
I know this.
I do not lie, white or
boldfaced or through
my teeth that grind. I
do not lie.
I watch you lie. I watch you
skirt the truth as if it all were a
game, and these are the rules that
You have created.
Children play games.
Children like to win, and
hate to lose.
I am tired of games, but it would be a
lie to say I never play. I
do not delight in their
back and forth duet of
self destruction,
quicksand of the self.
What my ego
delights in and what I
value are not the same. Our
schism is deep, though her
breathy desperation beckons still.
I am improving.
And she is dying. A
slow death, a starvation.
My brother thinks Voltaire is hot
Enlightenment book cover
Joemel Requeza
Don't Be An Enlightened Illiterate
(unless you want to live in a cave)
Engaging in body exercises, practicing breathing techniques, maintaining distance, and observing oneself are all essential for developing a deeper somatic understanding. These activities help individuals connect with their physical sensations and emotions, fostering greater awareness of their bodies and minds but it helps to strip away the idea that these practices are special or elevated. They are useful not because they contain some hidden wisdom, but because they give the system repeated, direct experiences of a different response while the state is actually happening.
When stress rises, your reactions are fast and physical. Breathing changes, muscles tighten, attention narrows, thoughts speed up or collapse. If you only think about this afterward, you stay at the level of knowledge. But when you bring in something like slower breathing, or a small physical adjustment, or even just noticing the first signs while they unfold, you are no longer only describing the process. You are interfering with it in real time.
That interference is small, but it is concrete. A slightly slower breath can reduce the intensity of the stress response. A moment of noticing can interrupt the automatic chain between feeling and action. Distancing, in a practical sense, can give a few seconds where the system does not immediately escalate. None of this removes the emotion, but it changes its course a little. If this happens once, it means very little. But if it happens many times, the system begins to register that stress does not always lead to the exact same sequence. That is where what people call “somatic understanding” starts to form. Not as an idea, but as a new tendency in how the body-mind reacts.
So these practices are not about calming yourself perfectly or achieving a special state. They are about creating repeated moments where the usual pattern is slightly altered. Over time, those small alterations accumulate. The reaction becomes less rigid, or you recognize it earlier, or you recover faster. That is the only place where understanding shows up in a real sense.
At the same time, it is easy to overestimate them. They do not give you control over your system, and they do not prevent stress from affecting your cognition. They just make the system a little less automatic, a little more adjustable at certain points. When your life isn't okay and you want to become enlightened, it's like wanting to own a dairy when you want to drink beer. You can, but why? They are useful, but not as a solution and not as a guarantee. They are tools that introduce variation into a process that otherwise repeats itself. The shift is modest but real.
Human beings all share the same basic way of perceiving the world.
We experience time passing, things taking up space, and events having causes. This structure is not personal and not chosen. It is simply how the human nervous system works. Without it, there would be no experience at all. On top of this shared structure, each person has a personal way of seeing shaped by childhood, relationships, fear, loyalty, habits, and unspoken rules about what is allowed to be seen and what is not.
Within this personal layer, there are blind spots. These are not just mistakes. They serve a function. They make life possible by filtering out things that would otherwise overwhelm or destabilize us. Other people can often see these blind spots clearly, while the person living inside them cannot. From the inside, the blind spot feels like reality itself.
The problem begins when a blind spot quietly organizes a whole life. Something can be active for years without being consciously recognized. It influences choices, emotions, and relationships. Sometimes it shows up indirectly, for example in dreams or repeated patterns, long before it becomes clear in waking awareness. Then there can be a sudden moment when perception shifts. What was always present becomes undeniable. At that point, it often feels as if someone else has betrayed us, but in truth it is our own perception that failed to register what was there.
This is why the real question is not mystical and not comforting. It is very concrete. What is already shaping my life right now, while I do not yet understand it? Not because it is hidden or unknowable, but because my current way of seeing cannot yet grasp it. Understanding, in this sense, means seeing necessity. It means recognizing what must be the case, what has been determining outcomes all along, regardless of my beliefs or hopes.
If there is any meaningful sense of clarity or enlightenment, it is not about feeling better or rising above limits. It is about slowly reducing these blind spots. It is about seeing more of what is already there, even when that seeing is painful and destabilizing. The limit itself does not disappear. What disappears is the confusion between “what I cannot yet see” and “what is not there at all.”
What most “enlightenment” discourse carefully avoids saying.
If you remove the ego as metaphysical center not as a biological function, but as the supposed owner, author, and addressee of existence then nothing makes sense in the way people usually mean by “sense.” Not your life. Not suffering. Not choices. Not even “your” existence.
And this is why the truth is rarely stated plainly. What gurus usually do is this sleight of hand. They deny the ego in words, but secretly keep its privileges. They remove the “little me,” but smuggle in a bigger one as awareness, presence, the universe knowing itself, consciousness loving itself, etc. That preserves meaning, consolation, and narrative continuity. It reassures.
But if you actually follow the logic all the way down as Spinoza does then yes. Without ego there is no protagonist (you). No protagonist then no story. Without story there no sense, purpose, lesson, or destiny
Existence does not “mean” anything. It does not even mean existence. This includes what you call “your existence.” That phrase already assumes ownership and narrative relevance. Strip that away, and what remains is a finite process occurring, not a life about someone.
This is why meditation, bliss-talk, and awakening rhetoric are often evasive. They promise relief without telling you the cost which is the collapse of sense itself.
The reason people are sent to sit cross-legged for decades is not because the insight is complex. It’s because the nervous system resists this conclusion with everything it has. Prolonged practices anesthetize the shock. Direct clarity does not. Nothing makes sense at the level of existence itself. Sense exists only as a human operating system for survival, not as a truth about reality. Enlightenment is not peace the end of "your" reality.
Transcendence in Practice
A concrete, bodily case not spiritual, not symbolic.A person is addicted to checking their phone. They know it’s compulsive. They try to understand it. “I do this because I’m anxious. I crave validation. I should replace this habit.” They analyze, interpret, and set rules. Yet the compulsion returns. The witness or seer, the self that analyzes is just another layer of control. Every insight creates more narrative about “why I do it,” keeping the feedback loop alive.
Eventually, something else happens, not as a decision but as fatigue. The person stops fighting. They still reach for the phone, but they also feel the micro-tension, the jolt of dopamine, the bodily restlessness, the hollow aftertaste. No story, no theory just exposure. Over time, that direct contact with the mechanism itself changes its weighting in the brain’s predictive hierarchy. The compulsion loses precision; the body recalibrates. The habit weakens.
No enlightenment, no “I have transcended.” Just the system learning the true metabolic cost of its loop.
That’s transcendence in practice. The shift from narrative regulation (“I understand why I do this”) to embodied recalibration (the system no longer finds this efficient). The loop ends when it spends more energy sustaining itself than dissolving.