Why is it that some museums won’t allow tourists to photograph art, yet millions of pictures can be found online? It is a matter of principle. When you photograph a piece of art, what you are seeing is no longer the piece of art, but a copy of it. A copy can never bear the same weight of value as the original. Imagine if everyone had a copy of a Starry Night hanging in their bedroom, or the Mona Lisa as their dining room conversational piece? All the mystery and wonder that comes with viewing art with one’s own eyes has been lost to reproducibility. In the above image, you see a person holding their smartphone up to a painting, admiring the photo they just took of it. Now, what was once one sole and original object, now has a cheap image of it. The phone image is also darker, smaller, and cannot provide the same contrast and detail that in-person viewing offers. Now the perspective of the art has shifted from original creation, to a cheapened and unfulfilling copy, lacking all interest, and only serving as a sort of visual bragging rights to those who you share it with. It is almost a sort of negative exposure of the painting, taking photos not to appreciate - as photographing would not be appreciating - but to mimic, and that is not flattery to the work and dedication put into each crafted piece of art.