Aravalli Verdict: Development or Desert in Disguise?
So now it’s official. The Aravalli mountain range, the oldest in India and the one that has shielded North India from the Thar for millions of years, will only be protected by law if it is at least 100 meters high. Anything shorter can quietly become mine, a farmhouse or a gated community with an infinity pool.
Because nothing says New India like putting a height filter on a 2.5-billion-year-old mountain and calling it reform.
The Honourable Supreme Court has accepted the Centre’s “scientific” formula: only hills rising at least 100 meters above local relief (plus slopes and some adjoining land) will count as Aravalli. Internal Forest Survey of India data shows what this really means: out of more than 12,000 mapped hills, only 1,048 qualify. That’s barely 8.7%. So roughly 90% of what people understood as the Aravalli may lose legal protection.
But don’t worry, we are told. Everything is “safe,” “protected,” “scientific,” and “sustainable.” Exactly like earlier “historic reforms” that came with tear gas, barricades, and year-long protests.
Meanwhile, reality on the ground is doing its own press conference. Rajasthan alone has seen thousands of illegal mining cases in the Aravalli districts in just a few years. A drone survey near Bhilwara found that while official records showed extraction of about 62 lakh tonnes, the actual figure was closer to 1.2 crore tonnes, almost double. But clearly, the problem is not the mining mafia. The problem is definitions.
So the same system that couldn’t control illegal mining under a ban now tells us, “Trust us, limited legal mining will be better controlled.” That’s like saying, “Since some people break the speed limit, let us remove all speed limits for safety.”
Environmental scientists are warning that if large parts of the Aravalli belt are opened up, desertification, groundwater collapse, and harsher heat waves will follow, especially across Delhi–NCR and adjoining states. But of course, that risk can be solved with air purifiers on EMIs and a fresh campaign: “Live more, breathe less.”
On paper, India’s forest and tree cover looks decent, a proud 25.17% of the geographical area, according to the India State of Forest Report 2023. Look a little closer, and the picture changes: actual tree cover is only 3.41% of the country. But who cares about trees when “green cover” can also mean plantations, scrub, and anything that looks vaguely non-brown from a satellite?
The real genius is in the template:
Step 1: Change the definition (forest, hill, buffer, consent).
Step 2: Declare that more area is now “scientifically covered”.
Step 3: Quietly free up land that no longer fits the new definition for “regulated” mining and construction.
From the Hasdeo forests in Chhattisgarh to Dehing Patkai in Assam and now the Aravalli, this pattern repeats with minor variations and major excavators. Add electoral bonds and generous donations from mining-linked companies, and suddenly “national interest” starts looking a lot like “corporate ROI.”
The best part? When citizens hit the streets under Save Aravalli, they are quickly upgraded from “voters” to “misguided,” “confused,” and, if needed, “foreign-funded.” When they stay silent, it is taken as consent. When they speak, it is called a conspiracy.
The Aravalli judgement isn’t just about one range. It is a live demo of how definitions can be weaponised against nature and how constitutional institutions can be gently steered using “expert committees” and “technical criteria” that most ordinary people neither have the time nor the tools to decode.
In school, children draw trees, rivers, and mountains every Environment Day. On the ground, adults redraw maps, rules, and meanings every time someone finds minerals underneath.
One side is shouting, “Save Aravalli.” The other is calmly replying, “Aravalli is safe on paper.”
Between those two sentences lies the gap where hills vanish, aquifers dry, sand travels, and cities slowly choke.
But relax. As long as a hill is 100 meters tall, it will be considered a hill. Everything else can be regarded as “collateral development.”
