when i took art in high school, one of the things we had to do was art critiques. basically put up our arts in front of the class and then share objective critiques of each other's works, with suggestions for improvement etc.
i remember dreading this part because (steven voice) *emotional damage*
especially with works you created, it's easy to be overly emotionally and personally invested in it. makes sense, it's something you created, only natural for you to want to own and and be proud of it. but because of this, anything negative aimed at it can be particularly distressing, because it feels like a personal attack on you and your self worth and your skill, and it's common to have an overly defensive reaction to such comments
so it's always important to remember, you are not your works. you created your works, but you can always create something better in the future.
it's kind of similar with programming. when you put up a code review with suggested changes to merge into develop branch and then the senior dev on your team just puts comments everywhere tearing it to shreds
except like the majority of the time they arent actually rude about it or anything, it just can feel like that. but really, the both of you are collaborating on making an improvement to the codebase, and you shouldn't be distressed at all. the code is the code, not you. you improve the code. that's it.
anyway that's easy to say and all but much harder to internalize. but after going through these processes many times, it gets easier.
the other thing to remember is context and expectations. often conflict can arise when there is a dissonance in expectations. e.g. the expectations in an interaction on a code review or a professional art critique is very different from the expectations of a comment on an fanart that someone posts on social media as a means of self-expression in hobby.
i think at least some of this dissonance is happening between papa shinonome and ena. maybe the harshness and bluntness is what he is used to in a professional art environment. but ena is not that. she's aiming for there, that's for sure, but papa shinonome is going a bit too strong too early with that i fear
at the end of insatiable pale colour, her dad compliments the light and dark contrast in her work, and makes a comment about the girl's worries vanishing, implying his understanding of the message that ena was trying to convey. he then follows it up with a rather blunt critique of the colour balance
ena seems to receive this criticism much better than than any of the other previous comments from her dad. she initially responds with a "why that jab!" after her dad walks out, but then actually doesn't disagree with the critique on the colour balance, and goes to fix up the colours a bit more.
it could be that she is a better place mentally, after just having received encouragement and support from her friends in N25. it could also be that she receives the critique a bit better when it is couched after a positive feedback first. (that's actually one of the things they taught us, the art critique sandwich. positive, then negative, then positive. papa shinonome doesn't follow it up with another positive feedback but eh close enough)
i think it's a bit of both.
but i think this demonstrates that papa shinonome's "throw her in the deep end with the harshness of the professional art world to try and protect her from it" isnt the best approach. see, she can improve at art! see, she can receive valid criticism without throwing a tantrum and improve upon it! but she's still young, she's still learning and maturing, so a gentler beginning can be more beneficial for her growth in the long run
walk before run, etc.
anyway i just think it's funny that akito is more insightful about parenting and what ena needs than their own dad 😭















