Day 12 - Forensic botany, the scientific study of plant remains, has been widely accepted as evidence since 1935.
Over 80 years ago, forensic botany was considered a valid scientific evidence by the courts when Arthur Koehler was able to prove that the ladder rail used in the kidnapping of Charles Lindbergh’s son matched the unique ring pattern found on the boards in Bruno Richard Hauptmann’s attic. This became crucial evidence in the Hauptmann trial that led to his conviction and later execution.
Utilizing both macroscopic and microscopic evidence, such as wood, seeds, fruits, leaves, twigs, plant hairs, microscopic air-borne pollen and spores, algal cells, etc. Forensic botany has an array of evidence to connect to the crime.
Forensic botany also has a series of sub-disciplines such as:
Palynology (study of pollens)
Dendrochronology (the study of tree rings)
Limnology (study of aquatic environments)
Systematics (classification of plants)
Ecology (the study of ecosystems)
Photo credit: Diversity of pollen morphology in Centrospermae
Source(s): {x} {x} {x} {x}