why are the frobin incorrects mostly accurate and then there's one trying to make emotional abuse tactics sound funny slipped in like a treat
Hey there anon! Happy new year!
I’m not exactly sure what you mean?
Are "FRobin incorrects" pro or anti FRobin?
Do you mean that people who are against Frobin are mostly right (or use at least logical arguments?) but then one uses abusive language and ideas "as a joke" and "a treat"?
Or do you mean that people who ship FRobin are logical in their arguments but then there is one who uses abusive language and ideas "as a joke" and "a treat"?
How would you use that as a treat?
Could you clear it up or could you give me an example because lucky me hasn’t see anything negative (pro or anti) recently. Or if you don’t want to share anything new, maybe there is an older example from this blog?
Sorry for not getting it.