Genuinely, nothing has ever been as mind-numbing as spending like 10 hours trying to complete like 8 school assignments.
there have actually been times when I just have to stop and go to bed because I have genuinely lost the ability to think
seen from China
seen from Türkiye

seen from United States

seen from Germany
seen from China

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from China

seen from Switzerland

seen from Switzerland

seen from Switzerland
seen from Switzerland
seen from Philippines
seen from Australia
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Italy
seen from China
seen from Australia
seen from United States
seen from Switzerland
Genuinely, nothing has ever been as mind-numbing as spending like 10 hours trying to complete like 8 school assignments.
there have actually been times when I just have to stop and go to bed because I have genuinely lost the ability to think
*writes an lit frq on hadestown*
Im completly normal
An Alternative DBQ Technique
Y’all-
What if instead of writing our DBQs in the standard format, we wrote historical person fanfiction using the documents given. Imagine being able to write John Locke X Thomas Jefferson. What a masterpiece. And the AP Readers would have to read it
But also, you could potentially get a few points if you did it right:
Contextualization, if you set the context for how your historical figure got to where he/she is
Thesis, if you somehow respond to the prompt in the first paragraph (ie “Thomas gazed into the eyes of Locke and said, “wow there certainly has been a lot of change over time since we declared independence from England. Now there’s more liberty, freedom, and happiness. I truly have followed your ideals””)
Sourcing documents if you provide the context around them. Because this is fanfiction, you could probably do this fairly easily, because you’d just have to describe their perspective as they wrote it.
Using documents and/or outside evidence would be difficult, particularly because they must address the prompt. Still, potentially being able to get 3 points when writing such wackiness would be pretty cool.
(I will probably legitimately do this over the summer when I both have the time and they publish the DBQ documents)
AP calc review/corrections :O
Me on my personal accounts: Huh, oh yeah AP Gov went well.
Me on Tumblr: So the FRQs.
The first one I wrote that Congress could blah blah blah. They can say their first amendment rights were being infringed, like in Citizens United V. FEC.
The data analysis was pretty easy. I talked about how republicans are stubborn children who would rather stick to their thoughts than compromise.
The SCOTUS comparison was super easy. Hernandez V. Texas was a vocab term for our Gov final, so we already knew the principles. Then, of course, we all know about Brown V. Board.
The LAQ; I struggled with a bit. I said it benefits policy making rather than hinders. But I came up with some bs about how the Articles gave states most of the power and it was a crappy time then. Which is why we have the Constitution now. For the counter I used United States V. Lopez to show overreach on the National Government's side.
And don't even get me started on the multiple choice. Like, I was expecting stuff on monetary and fiscal policy. ONE OF OUR QUESTIONS WAS TO LITERALLY COMPARE THE HOUSE AND THE SENATE. THEN THE ONE ABOVE IT WAS TO COMPARE THE ARTICLES OF CONFEDERATION TO THE CONSTITUTION. WHAT EVEN. I GET THIS IS A REDESIGN, BUT HOW CAN AN AP TEST BE THAT SIMPLE??
During the AP psych FRQ
To whoever grades my frq, I'm sorry I bled on the test :///
I vaguely remember the amazing nap I had during the lectures we had over hydroelectric dams in class, so for Part A of the last FRQ I literally wrote the joke, “What does a fish say when it runs into a concrete wall? Dam.”