From Star Wars Vol. 4 #008, “Desperate Measures”
Art by Pete Woods
Written by Alex Segura
seen from United States
seen from Algeria
seen from China
seen from United States

seen from Germany
seen from Germany

seen from Italy
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Russia

seen from Sweden
seen from China
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Saudi Arabia
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Germany

seen from United States
From Star Wars Vol. 4 #008, “Desperate Measures”
Art by Pete Woods
Written by Alex Segura
This blog is only three days old and I've already had a couple people message me regarding their logic behind their tagging things Victorian vs. Edwardian (Hello! And thank you for acknowledging me! I'm getting a lot more attention than I expected so soon! And none of it is hate yet, yay!). Do not worry, either of you--you actually had very similar reasoning which I totally get. Edwardian, when not labeled specifically as such can be very difficult to distinguish from Victorian. At first, I was going to include it if I had my doubts, but since then I have found myself skipping over posts such as these as they are not the goal of this collection. Unless something is specifically labeled as after 1901, then I will not bother to point out it might be mislabeled. I hope I don't ever come off as too much a tight-ass about semantics, but for something to be without a doubt Edwardian labeled as Victorian seems no different than something from 1989 being considered during the Reagan administration, at least to me, being an American that is. It's just not correct.
I looked up sponge cake and in Norwegian we have something like that called pikekyss. I tried to translate but it comes out "girl kiss." Now I think of the room, "girl kiss for Loki."
Our Norwegian pal Gauvis from the Sponge Cake Chatzy
You give me a laugh - kudos to you!
I am glad that you enjoy my company, then!