-ghadar history: through 1917
-contextualizing the independent Hindustan:
-connection with the irish
- in park’s book, example of ghadar’s appeal to other American immigrant communities, even the czech
- isolation from wider public and continued suspect status in the eyes of the state: park’s example, also example from kanta das (who wrote his book to dispel the kinds of rumors carried in park)
-engagement in american culture, imagery, and rhetoric: combatting isolation and persecution/outsider status
- October 1920 review of stoddard’s book—confronting racism, undermining notions of “white race” as valid, and arguing that what Stoddard saw as a conspiracy between brown people based on racial affiliation was an economic anti-imperialist movement
- a history of invoking American political heroes/calling their honor into question
-images of victimized india as a woman + demands for accountability from American public, plus a cynical acknowledgement that America colluded with british government
-cosmopolitan womanhood+aparajita
-if victimized india wasn’t going to get help from uncle sam, someone had better get on it--DIY
-women with agency+ education appear in the independent Hindustan a lot. This partly due to presence of agnes Smedley and others on staff of paper, but also a result of earlier feminist undertones. Har dayal +madame cama.
-aparajita—militant , educated, independent, also written by irishman
-at the same time, a defensive tone: insistence that indian men already side with their women+ uplift them, insistence are capable of having equal gender relations with women, indian customs are not misogynist. Question how Sita story fits into this? Ghadar willing to adopt damsel narratives when convenient/also secularizes hindu mythology
-race and labor around the world
-as ghadar insisted that indian men were already on the side of indian women, the ball was then rolled back into the rest of the world’s court: the view of women as ministering angels is turned on British in critiques of annie besant and women raising money for Dyer memorial—consciousness that white women are not invested in worldwide liberation of their indian sisters
-image of india/Mesopotamia/Ireland/Egypt and murderous John Bull: we are all in it together!!
-coverage of women laborers in Fiji +ghadar’s position as a labor movement, solidarity between colonized nations and their workers/coolies
-this breaks down with the positioning of Indians vs Fijian strikebreakers, and also with the studious lack of mentions of south African indigenous peoples or their problems, as well as with the repeated use of Philippines as a positive example
-ultimately it’s because of cold pragmatism on ghadar’s part, at least to an extent—rhetoric was useful, but based on the position of the paper and the movement, it was best to appeal to/try to relate to some movements over others. Antiblackness definitely also a part of it.
-but they still WANT to rely on this rhetoric of workers-of-the-world-unite, and as they get closer with the Bolsheviks, they invoke it in new ways