By Nahia Sanzo
Feb. 22: The increase in Ukrainian shelling has led to all kinds of rumors and reactions on both sides of the front line. While the authorities of the Donetsk and Lugansk People's Republics and the representatives of their armies seek to remain calm -- the objective is always to maintain the truce and not return to open battles -- and claim to have responded to the attack, the most alarmist see in the Ukrainian acts the restart of a larger-scale war. The bombings of recent days, which come, as was the case in Poroshenko's time, just a few days after the visit of Ukrainian President Zelensky to the front, make clear a change in trend: that truce in which the bombings had been significantly limited appears to have been broken and there is again the use of heavy weapons, constant attacks in numerous areas of the front, and casualties on both sides.
What has not changed is the Ukrainian argument. Almost seven years after the start of the war in Donbass in April 2014, Kiev continues to claim that they are complying with the Minsk agreements and the agreed truce, and make the People's Republics bear the blame for each escalation, despite the fact they have not advanced on Ukrainian positions for several years. The same cannot be said of Ukraine, which even in this truce has advanced and fortified itself in the supposedly neutral zone -- and the ability of the Donbass defenders to respond to the Ukrainian fire is seriously limited by orders to maintain the truce at all costs. Even so, Ruslan Jomchak, Chief of Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine stated on Saturday that "Russian formations opened fire on their own positions." Kiev thus uses the same excuse so often used in Poroshenko’s time to justify Ukrainian bombing and blame, not even the DPR and LPR, but Russia.
















