Alright y’all, this is a little random and out of the blue, but this is a personal blog with no aesthetic anyways, so here we go.
I was looking at some British and American 1700s art for my American History Class. And, me being who I am, I got super hyper fixated on one random inconsequential detail that really didn't matter the overall assignment, and I don't want my teacher to think I'm crazy, so all y’all on Tumblr can deal with this instead.
We're learning about "Grand Manner" art. It's a style of art from the time period that took a lot of the realistic styles/methods/concepts from the Italian Renaissance and said, "hey, what if we did that, but more idyllic and symbolic?" And at first, I was like, okay, all art kinda does that, like it all has something it's trying to say.
But these paintings, I swear. So the most prominent thing they do is say fuck you to the sun and make the light highlight whatever they think is important. It's not garish and glaring, though. Sometimes it could even be natural.
Sir Arthegal, the Knight of Justice, with Talus, the Iron Man (from Spenser’s ‘Faerie Queene’)
See what I mean? It could be natural, it just probably isn't, and it's definitely drawing your eye exactly where the artist wants it. This is a UK example, but the Americans did it, too.
https://americanart.si.edu/artist/charles-willson-peale-3720 (The Artist in his Museum)
And I really like this piece. I like the way my eye went first to the guy's dark clothes against the relative beiges and to his semi-highlighted face, then to the brightly light floor by his feet with the artifacts on it, and finally through curtain he`s holding to the museum beyond, with its light subtly illuminating the visitors. I think it`s really cool and looks more realistic than the first one.
And then I saw these paintings:
King Lear Weeping over the Dead Body of Cordelia
The Death of Major Peirson, 6 January 1781
Not only did these men defy the sun to paint their paintings, they defied the very winds.
The first one is far more obvious. The soldier`s plume and the king`s hair are blowing towards each other. That is some fake news. But it, coupled with the shaping of the background, serves to make the whole picture circle around the slain Cordelia.
The second one took me longer to spot, but the flags and smoke shouldn`t be going that way.
Why? You say. They`re both slanted the same way.
Yes, I say. And it`s wrong. I drew a diagram because I wasn`t sure how to word this.
Sorry for all the blank space, and I really hope that`s visible, but it shows that right-directional (from the painting viewer`s perspective) wind would be required to make the smoke billow like it does, but left-directional wind would be required to slant the flags.
So yeah. That`s the story of how some dudes decided to screw the laws of physics for the aesthetic and I decided to screw my homework to tell Tumblr about it.
Thanks for coming to my TedTalk.













