#hackgate for beginners

[payaltest-blog]

Hackgate for Beginners - Who's Who & The Key Reports

[Back to Controversial Cops and News Corp.] Thanks to a regular contributor for putting this latest information together. The following useful information is mainly extracted from a Briefing Note for Members of Parliament, published 26 June 2012, 'Phone hacking – Inquiries and Reports'

This note provides brief details about the ongoing inquiries and investigations associated with phone hacking and the various reports produced. It also gives details of the legislation regarding relevant offences and provides links to timelines of events.

The Briefing Note is fully referenced and hyperlinked. It contains information on the Leveson Inquiry, on-going investigations by the Metropolitan Police Servive and Strathclyde Police, and the relevant offences being looked at. WHO'S WHO From the House of Commons Culture, Media and Sport Select Committee (CMS) published report 'News International and Phone-hacking': Annex 1 Who's Who (Note: This is a Names Glossary only of those who appeared before the CMS Select Committee) Annex 2 Timeline of Events BACKGROUND - RELEVANT REPORTS 2003-2010 Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) - May 2006  'What Price Privacy? The Unlawful Trade in Confidential Personal Information' Information Commissioner's Office - Dec 2006 'What Price Privacy Now?' (ICO) Press Complaints Commission (PCC) - May 2007  'Report on Subterfuge and Newsgathering' Press Complaints Commissionn (PCC) - Nov 2009  'Report on Phone Message Tapping Allegations' (This report was subsequently withdrawn  July 2011) Culture, Media and Sport Select Committee (CMS) - May 2003  'Privacy and Media Intrusion' Culture, Media and Sport Select Committee - July 2007  'Self–Regulation of the Press'  Culture, Media and Sport Select Committee - Feb 2010  'Press Standards, Privacy and Libel' KEY REPORTS AND WITNESS EVIDENCE 2011-2012 Footage of hearings evidence is available for the two following Key Reports, archived on Parliament TV. Parliament TV archive is searchable so, for ease, dates of witness appearances are included below. HOME AFFAIRS SELECT COMMITTEE (HAC) - July 2011  Report: 'Unauthorised Tapping into or Hacking of Mobile Communications'  Witnesses Tuesday 29 March 2011 Chris Bryant, MP John Yates, Assistant Commissioner, Metropolitan Police Tuesday 5 April 2011 Mr Keir Starmer QC, Director of Public Prosecutions Tuesday 26 April 2011 Christopher Graham, Information Commissioner Tuesday 14 June 2011 Ms Julie Steele, Head of Fraud, Risk and Security, Vodafone UK; Mr Adrian Gorhan, Group Head of Fraud, Security and Business Continuity, Telefonica O2; and Mr James Blendis, Vice President Legal, Everything Everywhere (Orange UK and T-Mobile UK) Tuesday 12 July 2011 John Yates, Assistant Commissioner, Specialist Operations, Metropolitan Police Mr Peter Clarke, Former Deputy Assistant Commissioner, Metropolitan Police Mr Andy Hayman, Former Assistant Commissioner, Metropolitan Police Sue Akers, QPM, Deputy Assistant Commissioner, Head of Operation Weeting, Metropolitan Police Tuesday 19 July 2011 Sir Paul Stephenson, Commissioner, Metropolitan Police Dick Fedorcio, OBE, Director of Public Affairs, Metropolitan Police John Yates, Assistant Commissioner, Specialist Operations, Metropolitan Police Lord Macdonald of River Glaven, former Director of Public Prosecutions Keir Starmer, QC, Director of Public Prosecutions Mark Lewis, Solicitor advocate, Taylor Hampton Solicitors Limited CULTURE, MEDIA and SPORT SELECT COMMITTEE -May 2012  Report: 'News International and Phone-hacking' Witnesses Thursday 24 March 2011 John Yates QPM, Acting Deputy Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police Service Tuesday 19 July 2011 Rupert Murdoch, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, News Corporation, and James Murdoch, Chairman, News International Rebekah Brooks, former Chief Executive, News International Tuesday 6 September 2011 Jonathan Chapman, former Director of Legal Affairs, News International, and Daniel Cloke, former Group HR Director, News International Tom Crone, former Legal Manager, News Group Newspapers, and Colin Myler, former Editor, News of the World Wednesday 19 October 2011 Julian Pike, Partner, Farrer & Co. Mark Lewis, Partner, Taylor Hampton Solicitors Monday 24 October 2011 Les Hinton, Former Executive Chairman, News International Thursday 10 November 2011 James Murdoch, Deputy Chief Operating Officer and Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (International), News Corporation [Index] You can contact the author on Twitter @brown_moses or by email at [email protected]

[payaltest-blog]

Hackgate for Beginners - Index

Index Past Police Operations Current Police Operations The Murder of Daniel Morgan The Leveson Inquiry Controversial Cops and News Corp. Who's Who & The Key Reports [Forward to Past Police Operations] You can contact the author on Twitter @brown_moses or by email at [email protected]

[payaltest-blog]

Hackgate for Beginners - The Leveson Inquiry

[Back to the Murder of Daniel Morgan]

Build up to the Inquiry

After Operation Weeting commenced in January 2011 there began to be calls for an independent inquiry into phone hacking from a number of political and private figures, along with a number of newspapers, in particular the Guardian, who in July 4th 2011 reported that the phone of murdered schoolgirl Milly Dowler had been hacked by News of the World journalists, who deleted voicemails left on the phone, creating a moment of false hope for her family.

With this revelation the phone hacking scandal soon became the top of news agenda, with celebrities and other public figures reacting with disgust and calling for an immediate public inquiry, and on July 6th British Prime Minister David Cameron promised that he would set up a public inquiry into phone hacking at the News of the World, describing the claims in the Guardian story as “disgusting”.  Opposition leader Ed Miliband went onto say that David Cameron had failed “to react with the necessary speed” and urged him to set up a wide-ranging, judge-led public inquiry immediately.

The setting up of the Inquiry

On July 17th 2011 David Cameron set out the remit for the inquiry under the Inquiry Act 2005 (requiring witnesses to give evidence under oath), naming Lord Justice Leveson as the chairman of the inquiry, and stating that it would look into the ethics and culture of the British media as well as specific claims about phone hacking at the News of the World, the shortcomings of the initial police inquiry, and allegations of illicit payments to police by the press. 

Lord Justice Leveson appointed a panel of 6 assessors, who are experts in various areas relevant to the Inquiry, and described their role during the September 28th meeting of the Inquiry:

“I intend that each should have a central role in the work and that the final report will be a collaborative effort.  I will strive for unanimity; if any particular recommendation is not unanimous, I shall make the contrary view clear.”

He also appointed a team of 6 barristers to act as Counsel to the Inquiry, who provide legal advice to the Inquiry, as well as questioning witnesses.  If you’ve been watching the Inquiry you’ll probably be most familiar with Robert Jay QC, who regularly questions witnesses, and has built up a bit of a fan base among followers of the Leveson Inquiry.

Lord Leveson has said the inquiry will be in two parts, the first being split into four modules.  The first part will address: And the second part will address:

The culture, practices and ethics of the press, including contacts between the press and politicians and the press and the police; it is to consider the extent to which the current regulatory regime has failed and whether there has been a failure to act upon any previous warnings about media misconduct.

The four modules that make up part one are:

The extent of unlawful or improper conduct within News International, other media organisations or other organisations. It will also consider the extent to which any relevant police force investigated allegations relating to News International, and whether the police received corrupt payments or were otherwise complicit in misconduct.

Module 1: The relationship between the press and the public and looks at phone-hacking and other potentially illegal behaviour.

Module 2: The relationships between the press and police and the extent to which that has operated in the public interest.

Module 3: The relationship between press and politicians.

Module 4: Recommendations for a more effective policy and regulation that supports the integrity and freedom of the press while encouraging the highest ethical standards.

At the same time Lord Leveson also detailed the Inquiry’s terms of reference.

Lord Leveson also announced a series of briefing sessions would take place before the Inquiry began to provide the members of the Inquiry with factual background information that was relevant to the inquiry:

Briefing Session 1: Techniques of access to personal data

Briefing Session 2: Current media law

Briefing Session 3: Regulatory systems

He also held a series of seminars “to enable consideration of the central public policy issues in the Inquiry’s terms of reference to be enriched by and examined from across a range of informed perspectives.”

Seminar 1: The Competitive Pressures on the Press and the Impact on Journalism  

Seminar 2: The Rights and Responsibilities of the Press

Seminar 3: Supporting a free press and high standards – approaches to regulation

Core participants

One key feature of the Leveson Inquiry is the assignment of Core Participant (CP) status to individuals or organisations, who can become CPs if they meet one of more of the following criteria:

The person played, or may have played, a direct and significant role in relation to the matters to which the inquiry relates;

The person has a significant interest in an important aspect of those matters to which the inquiry relates; or

The person may be subject to explicit or significant criticism during the inquiry proceedings or in its report.

Among other things Core Participants have a right to view witness statements from people giving evidence to the inquiry before they appear, and have the right to appoint a legal representative who may apply to the chairman to ask questions of a witness giving oral evidence to the Inquiry.  Current Core Participants include a number of newspaper groups, the Metropolitan Police, and the NUJ.  The victims are for the most part represented by David Sherborne, who you will occasionally see asking questions to various witnesses.

The Leveson Inquiry so far

Module one of the Leveson Inquiry made headlines with a raft of celebrities and high profile figures appearing and describing how they’d be harassed by the press.  The first day of Module one had the parents of Milly Dowler talking about their treatment by the press, followed by Hugh Grant, which made headlines from day one.  That that followed over the next weeks by high profile figures such as Steve Coogan, JK Rowling, Max Mosley, and Charlotte Church, among others, keeping the story in the press.  As the weeks passed media interest waned, with only the occasional absurd statements such as “privacy is for paedos” making it to the wider press. 

However, as the Inquiry has gone on a picture has been built showing the relationship between the press, politicians, and police that’s shown collusion on many levels and in a sometimes illegal fashion.  Many witnesses for organisations under the spotlight have shown they are unable to recall facts about key events, or have used such convoluted language to avoid admitting to anything under oath that they are practically unintelligible.  Due to current police investigations it’s been impossible to ask certain witnesses about events they’ve been arrested for, for example Rebekah Brooks, but more and more information is being made available which exposes criminality, corruption and sleaze at a variety of organisations, including the British government.

It would be quite impossible to cover the many developments in the Leveson Inquiry, but a number of news websites have good archives of past day’s events, in particular The Guardian and the BBC News website. [Forward to Controversial Cops and News Corp.] [Index]

You can contact the author on Twitter @brown_moses or by email at [email protected]

[payaltest-blog]

Hackgate for Beginners - The Murder of Daniel Morgan

[Back to Current Police Operations]

In March 1987 Daniel Morgan, a private detective, was murdered in Sydenham in south east London, just as he was reportedly close to revealing police corruption with links to the News of the World.

You might ask why we would want to look at a murder that took place 25 years ago, but it’s important to understand that the collusion between the police and press that’s being uncovered now isn’t just about events that took place in the past few years, but a pattern of corruption that goes back many decades, and that many of the people involved with past corruption are still involved with the Hackgate scandal even now.

After repeated failed police inquiries into the murder which themselves have been mired in corruption the family of Daniel Morgan are still seeking justice, and have spent the past two decades running the Justice 4 Daniel campaign.

Southern Investigations

In 1984 Daniel Morgan and Jonathan Rees set up the detective agency Southern Investigations.  Jonathan Rees is alleged to have had a “network of corrupt police who were involved in widespread criminality and used Southern Investigations as a conduit for drugs and money”, and that Rees “counted many officers as friends. One of his specialities was to use his "friends" in the force to provide information which he sold to tabloid newspapers.”

On the other hand Daniel Morgan’s role “involved him acting as a bailiff or utilising his particular talent for remembering car registration plates and telephone numbers”.

It is believed that at the time of his murder Daniel Morgan was planning to expose police corruption, described by his brother as “police involvement with criminals, involvement with drugs and weapons importation."

More recently, Tom Watson MP alleged in a Commons adjournment debate that Daniel Morgan has approached Alex Muranchak of the News of the World with a story making allegations about police corruption a week before he died, and was offered £40,000 for the story.  He described the relationship between Jonathan Rees and Alex Marunchak as "a close association between Rees and Marunchak ... a relationship that was so close they both had companies registered at the same address".  Watson also stated that "thanks to a Guardian investigation we also know that Southern Investigations paid the debts of Marunchak ".

Alex Marunchak would go on to deny those allegations, as well as other allegations made by Tom Watson.

The death of Daniel Morgan

At 9.30pm on Tuesday March 10th 1987 Daniel Morgan’s body was discovered next to his BMW in the parking lot of the Golden Lion pub.  An axe, wrapped in Elastoplasts to obscure fingerprints, was protruding at a right angle from his face, his pockets torn open, with notes he had been seen writing missing, but with his wallet and watch still on his body, and he was still holding the two packets of crisps purchased inside the pub.

He had let the Golden Lion pub at 8:55pm after meeting with Jonathan Rees to discuss an issue that was putting pressure on their already fraught relationship.  Rees had claimed he had been robbed while transporting £18,000 for a client of Southern Investigations, Belmont Car Auctions, with at least one moonlighting police officer.  Both Morgan and Belmont Car Auctions believed this was a lie, and Rees and his associates had taken the money for themselves.

At the 1988 inquest into the murder the Southern Investigations accountant Kevin Lennon said that Jonathan Rees had told him “I've got the perfect solution for Daniel's murder. My mates at Catford nick are going to arrange it” and went on to say "He went on to explain to me that if they didn't do it themselves the police would arrange for some person over whom they had some criminal charge pending to carry out Daniel's murder."

The initial police investigation into the murder

Detective Sergeant Sid Fillery at Catford police station was assigned to the case, failing to reveal to his superiors that he had been working for Southern Investigations

At the 1988 inquest Kevin Lennon said Rees wanted Morgan dead after a row: "John Rees explained that, when or after Daniel Morgan had been killed, he would be replaced by a friend of his who was a serving policeman, Detective Sergeant Sid Fillery", and eventually would end up in business with Jonathan Rees at Southern Investigations, recruiting corrupt police officers, and was later convicted for the possession of child pornography.

Sid Fillery and Jonathan Rees would later be arrested in 1987 on suspicion of murder, along with the brothers Glenn and Garry Vian and two Metropolitan police officers, but eventually all of them were released without charge.

Inquiries into the murder

Over the next 20 years five investigations would look into the murder of Daniel Morgan.  The initial investigation into the murder by the Metropolitan Police focused on Sid Fillery and Jonathan Rees, both who denied involvement in the murder.  This was followed by an inquiry by Hampshire Police in 1988 focusing on Jonathan Rees and another man, but the charges were dropped because of a lack of evidence, with the Hampshire inquiry's 1989 report to the Police Complaints Authority stated that "no evidence whatsoever" had been found of police involvement in the murder.  During this period Sid Fillery left the police to join Southern Investigations as Jonathan Rees’ business partner.

In 1999 Operation Nigeria began to investigate Southern Investigations, with bugs being placed inside the Southern Investigations offices by the police.  The operation ceased when Jonathan Rees was recorded conspiring with a corrupt police officer to plant cocaine on an innocent woman in order to discredit her during a custody battle, and in December 2000 he was jailed for seven years.

In 2002-2003 a fourth inquiry began, involving the bugging of a suspect’s car and the home of Glenn Vian.  The investigation obtained evidence that linked a number of individuals to the murder, but the Crown Prosecution Service decided there was insufficient evidence to proceed with a prosecution.

The fifth inquiry took place in 2006, headed by Detective Superintendent David Cook was set up in secret after Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Ian Blair declared that the first investigation had been compromised by the involvement of Sid Fillery.

Concerns over connections between Masonic Lodge members and the murder required the 36 police officers involved with the case to state they had never been Freemasons, with Cook describing the murder as being one of the worst kept secrets in south-east London, claiming “a whole cabal of people” knew the identity of at least some of those involved.  He also claimed attempts had been made to smear Daniel Morgan’s character and there had been attempts to link him with Colombian drug dealers.  He identified the main suspects as "white Anglo-Saxons".

Yet again bugs were placed, Jonathan Rees, Sid Fillery, and Glenn and Gary Vian were arrested, along with a builder, James Cook, all on suspicion of murder, plus other related charges.  This time however, the suspects made it to court.

The 2011 Old Bailey trial

The trial was badly handled by the prosecution, with 3 supergrass informers being dismissed as key witnesses, resulting in a stay of prosecution for Sid Fillery and James Cook being discharged. 

In March 2011 the Director of Public Prosecutions abandoned the case and all remaining charges were dropped.  The case had yet to reach the stage where it would look at the murder as it was still dealing with preliminary issues when the prosecution collapsed.  The judge noted the case’s vastness and complexity, and considered that the prosecution had been principled and right to drop the case, but the police had “ample grounds to justify the arrest and prosecution of the defendants”.

A massive amount of evidence had been gathered, over 750,000 documents, with four more crates of evidence being discovered after the trial collapsed. 

Links to the News of the World

After the trial collapsed it was revealed that Jonathan Rees had been working for the News of the World, earning £150,000 supplying illegally obtained information about figures in the public eye.  After serving the prison sentence for perverting the course of justice after the Operation Nigeria inquiry Andy Coulson, then editor of the News of the World, hired Jonathan Rees, and worked regularly with the Sunday and Daily Mirror as well.  Andy Coulson was later hired by David Cameron as director of communications despite warnings about Andy Coulson’s hiring of the convicted criminal Jonathan Rees.

Using a network of corrupt police officers he illegally obtained information on a variety of public figures, including the Royal family, and was also alleged to have commissioned burglaries on behalf of journalists.  However, despite detailed evidence the Metropolitan Police failed to pursue any action against Rees, even to the point of taking the News of the World at their word that Clive Goodman had worked alone when he was convicted for intercepting phone calls from Clarence House. [Forward to The Leveson Inquiry] [Index]

You can contact the author on Twitter @brown_moses or by email at [email protected]