Barilla
Barilla is a pasta company that bases its brand identity on the family and the role that its pasta has in family dinners. On September 26, 2013 pasta heir Guido Barilla said “I would never do (a commercial) with a homosexual family, not for lack of respect, but because we don’t agree with them.” He then went on to say, “Ours is a classic family where the woman plays a fundamental role.” He then concluded the interview by saying that if gay families, “like our pasta and our advertising, they’ll eat our pasta. If they don’t like it, then they will not eat it and they will eat another brand. These comments lead to a boycott of the brand. On September 30, 2013 posted a video apologizing for his remarks on the company website. He also vowed to meet with groups “that best represent the evolution of the family, including those that have been offended by my words.”
There are ethical concerns about Barilla’s statements. The first and largest is his attack of gay families. He stated that gay families were not families because he thinks that in the classic family the woman plays a “fundamental role” this is also infuriating to me because it implies that a family is not a family without a woman relegated to the kitchen preparing pasta for her family. Barilla’s comments are a problem to the brand’s identity because no one wants to buy bigoted pasta. If the brand is associated with ignorant and outdated ideals that it may be considered wrong to buy that pasta. These comments could also be harmful to children to have heteronormative hegemonic ideals reinforced through their parent’s choice in pasta.
I think Barilla’s apology is satisfactory provided he follows through with his vow ad actually meets with the groups that he said he would. The company should not have to change drastically in order to repair its image after the controversy. They do not need to start huge new advertising campaigns directed towards same sex couples. It would just be nice if they were to briefly include a gay family in an advertisement as gesture to signify that they are trying to be more inclusive of different lifestyles. They may also want mix it up and maybe have a woman come home to a meal prepared by a man, just to mix it up. It is still too early to see the effect that these comments will have on the company, if they effect the company, but I think this controversy serves as an important lesson to other companies who have similar regards towards gay families.
http://nypost.com/2013/09/26/barilla-chairman-gays-can-eat-someone-elses-pasta/
http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/business/2013/09/30/barilla-executive-gays-apology/2895831/













