#hate rate

[pobopolybius]

*mauls you* you suck so bad

999999/10. Terrifying. Would start crying if you did this to me irl. Has the guts to go off anon like a champ. Demian badge of honour

[pobopolybius]

you're white yourself delete your blog and fix the problem

0/10 not even a 1 bc anon coward behavior. Just completely lacks creativity and is from an obvious stalker who is mad at me for months ago having laughed at a poll. Get better material boooo

[shapa-likes-art]

For the hate rate: you are baby-sized U-U

10/10

Send me some "hate" anons and I'll rate them!

[shapa-likes-art]

(for rate the hate)

i bet your head is shaped like an overripe pear

1/10

Send me "hate" anons and I'll rate them!

[despiteherself]

Here’s a different version of the ask. You think hicctrid is only sexist on Astrid’s side but never mind that men don’t always need a love interest at the end. no only focus on women. Because men can’t be victims of sexism either am I right? Is it loaded now? Because I have no idea what a loaded question means. I am like 14 so yeah you just insulted a minor. Good job asshole.

here’s a new hate rate: 

restructuring the same ask: haven’t had that before, good for frustration. 5/5

what is google?: honestly, here’s a free tip i find it really useful when i need to confirm meanings (seriously, i’m always forgetting which way ventral/dorsal is haha) is to type “define:” (without the “”) into google before the word or phrase you don’t know. it should bring a definition up straight away of the word. sometimes i find you have to search for words so define: really helps to tell google that’s specifically what you want. 3/5

bringing up that you’re minor: Classic TM. who doesn’t love implying that being a minor means you can be demanding or rude as you want and that you’re untouchable. imagine the shit you can get away with. 4/5 

behind anonymous: implying someone they should just Know things about you, including your thought process whilst being a complete stranger with no context is definitely annoying. 4/5

setting bounderies is harassment (implied): what can i say? Classic. 4/5

total rate: 4/5

honourable mention to calling me an asshole. 

[despiteherself]

Hey can I ask you something? Why don’t you and ink like hiccup? You both seem to cry hicctrid as sexist on Astrid’s side but never mind that guys don’t always need a love interest at the end no only focus on women. Because men can’t be victims of sexism either am I right.

here’s your hate rate: 

loaded question: i’m going to give 4/5 as i’ve never received one on this blog but i think it’s a really classic way to get ppl upset. 

hasty generalisation: this links into the loaded question, but i appreciate misrepresenting someone’s opinion/thoughts for them because what a way to get someone’s hackles up. and it’s a great way to encourage miscommunication. i’m also going to include lack of reading any previous material/faq in here because not bothering with all information is a part of a hasty generalisation. 5/5

speaking for someone else: it’s true, ink and i are a hive mind. 3/5

equivocation: honestly it’s only tiring, but it also includes a logical fallacy/untruth and that raises it’s score up slightly 2/5

total score: 3.5/5

but all in all, i think this is a great way to make someone annoyed. loaded questions never provide a genuine space to discuss something and puts the person on the defensive, so it’s fantastic at disadvantaging the person you’re speaking to and make them upset. especially if they’ve expressed difficulty with communication before! 

[myragewillendworlds]

bitch, first of all: don't fucking call me ignorant. you don't even know me. i'm not an "alt-right" trying to dismiss trans kids. i sent that message after reading the debate between some bloggers. i didn't even see that article until now. do you have any idea how cluttered people's dashboard can be? you think your blog so important that people read it like newspaper every morning? if i had read the article before, i wouldn't have said that. i wouldn't have said anything at all.

Apparently I’m important enough for you to feel the need to come tell me all this, lmao.

you don’t have to act like a cunt to people every time. ps: you ~literally~ can’t even tell when exactly a message was sent.

XKit ~literally~ tells me the time a message was sent.

That second post where right-wing blogs are mentioned wasn’t a reply to you, or it would have been in the answer to the ask. It’d been in my Drafts since last night, when I was too tired to work it out properly. I answered/posted a bunch of things in a row there. You think your one sentence was so important I’d write several posts about them?

So you thought you knew something and you base your opinions around this false knowledge, then when you get corrected, you fly off the handle and send such a ridiculous angry reply. You’re embarrassed, that’s clear. You had a good opportunity here to turn it around and humiliate me properly if you wanted to send hate, but it just ended up being a pissy rant by someone who sounds very young. Less use of “bitch” next time, it only makes you sound like a little bitch yourself. I’ve had far better angry anons.4/10.

[bruhgeetuh]

ur anons are really unoriginal but 1/10 for effort?

hehe