#hawtbob

[sculderlaw-blog]

myassbrokethefall replied to your post:Supreme Davis, what are the Penal codes protecting hawt actors from Bob shots?

heh heh…penal codes

IKR? I almost just filled my response with various forms of text laughter and ridiculous giffage. But I felt a responsibility, as the original law school anon, to give it some serious thought.

[sculderlaw-blog]

Supreme Davis, what are the Penal codes protecting hawt actors from Bob shots?

Ah, the First Amendment VS Right to Privacy, in the U.S. at least. Although somewhat knowledgeable, I am probably not qualified to address other countries. The Supreme Court has been hesitant to define privacy rights and there is a lot of uncertainty how one would apply them to celebrities anyway. Though NY and CA probably have the most stringent laws regarding these matters, no statutes would necessarily prevent Bob shots unless they were obtained when said hawt actor was in seclusion with a reasonable expectation of privacy. Hawt may have a claim against such a shot if it were used for commercial rather than journalistic purposes, such as promoting a new line of underwear, without his permission. Essentially, there is not much protection out there for Bob. How do you feel about that, anon?