Constantly forget that I have this tumblr. This is from last year. Designing hats is one of my fav things.

seen from United States
seen from Croatia

seen from Netherlands

seen from Singapore
seen from Saudi Arabia
seen from South Korea
seen from T1
seen from Germany

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Canada

seen from T1

seen from United States
seen from Philippines
seen from Saudi Arabia
seen from United States
seen from Venezuela

seen from United States
seen from Libya
seen from Croatia
Constantly forget that I have this tumblr. This is from last year. Designing hats is one of my fav things.
For Marx. Louis Althusser 1962
Part 2: On the Young Marx
1. political—theoretical—philosophical
1) Political
: For Althusser, historicizing Marx means distinguishing
the radical history/ the history he was going to live the history he did live/ an immediate history the reflected history he gave us/ the ‘truth’ in Hegelian sense the principles of its scientific understanding REAL/IDEAL (immediate, truth)
: The Yong Marx is taken up politically by the mature Marx (Capital). By whom?
2) Theoretical
i) analytic: the system is reducible to its elements
ii) teleological: the path is determined by the reader’s goal
iii) ideological: auto-intelligibility of ideology
- critiquing the way Marx’s early work is read “from the viewpoint of developed Marxism” (18)
- dualistic view of materialism/idealism
3) Historical
- the events of his thought/real history (the subject of the thought)
- inversion theme: mere rotation of Hegelian dialectic (“setting back onto its feet” 36)
- Young Marx’s writings: “same structure, its problems and the meaning of these problems are still haunted by the same problematic” (36)
Q. Distinguish Feuerbachian materialism vs. Marxian materialism (dialectical)
*problematic(formulation of the problem):
“The examination of the status of this declaration called for a theory and a method – the Marxist theoretical concepts in which the reality of theoretical formations in general (philosophical ideologies and science) can be considered must be applied to Marx himself. Without a theory of the history of theoretical formations it would be impossible to grasp and indicate the specific difference that distinguishes two different theoretical formations. I thought it possible to borrow for this purpose the concept of a ‘problematic’ from Jacques Martin to designate the particular unity of a theoretical formation and hence the location to be assigned to this specific difference and the concept of an ‘epistemological break’ from Gaston Bachelard to designate the mutation in the theoretical problematic contemporary with the foundation of a scientific discipline.” (xxxi)