#holmes stuff

[here-on-occasion]

isn't it cool how every sherlock holmes adaptation for visual media has to reckon with the loss of Watson as narrator? I think it's so cool how every sherlock holmes adaptation for visual media has to reckon with the loss of Watson as narrator

[here-on-occasion]

sherlock holmes: *falls off that stupid waterfall again*

me: *gasp* diva down

[here-on-occasion]

idgaf calling your modernisation of A Study in Scarlet "A Study in Pink" is so vivid so heightened so chic

[here-on-occasion]

honestly there's not a force on this earth that could make me care about sherlock holmes's family and I don't understand why every adaptation is so determined to change that

[here-on-occasion]

scan isn't even my favourite short but I could talk about it for months. acd writes Irene Adler like he knows exactly what's going to happen to her image

[here-on-occasion]

kinda frustrating seeing people treat "you see, but you do not observe" as nothing more than a cool quote when it's pivotal to the theme of the story it appears in.

then again, you could say that's quite fitting for the same reason.

[here-on-occasion]

fun fact: every time you say the name "Godfrey Norton" a different sherlock holmes adapter startles awake in a cold sweat.

[here-on-occasion]

of course multiverse theory was founded in 1895. of course it was.