Quick Summary:
Today, JavaScript developers get a wide range of options to build mobile applications. This is where cross-platform mobile development enters. Currently, it is a tedious challenge to decide the best framework for developing mobile apps. Although native mobile development is the most preferred one, it is time-consuming. However, the benefits that it offers are incredible. With fast operating speed, updated SDKs, seamless app performance, and high responsive UIs, one can always overlook the time factor. Isn’t it? Today in this guide, we will focus and compare the two brilliant frameworks: NativeScript Vs React Native that is used in native mobile development. Keep reading!
Introduction
For business owners, the entire concept of building an application for their businesses is definitely an excellent idea. But, before building an application, there are a series of activities and decisions that business owners need to make. When it comes to developing an app, having a dilemma between Native apps and Hybrid apps has always been around the corner.
In this internet age where applications are everywhere and digital marketing is the ideal form of advertising, knowing the difference between Native and hybrid apps is the first and foremost step to figuring out what kind of app would help your business reach heights. The next step will be to find out the best framework to build a native app: Nativescript vs React Native.
Hence, before heading onto building applications, we have come up with this guide that discusses the basics of hybrid and native apps briefly.
How are Native Applications Different from Hybrid Applications?
Native applications
Generally, Native applications are smartphone apps that are specifically built for certain operating systems: Android or iOS. This is exactly what strikes most minds while thinking of mobile apps. They are usually downloaded from Google Play or App Store and installed on a device/system.
What makes native apps different from hybrid apps is that they are developed and built for particular devices. For example, let’s take Android apps and iOS apps. Android apps are built with Java while the apps for iPhone are using Swift or Objective-C.
Here, the advantage of choosing native apps over hybrid apps is that it is the most reliable and fastest approach when it comes to user experience. Built with the operating system’s SDKs, native apps can interact with all the device features including camera, microphone, device storage, GPS, etc.
Hybrid applications
Hybrid applications comprise both Native and Web app features. One can access a hybrid app through a Web browser and can be downloaded from app stores. Hybrid applications are written in JavaScript and HTML5 for web apps. In other terms, hybrid applications are web pages wrapped in a mobile app that uses a WebView.
However, these apps have access to the built-in features and capacities of the device. Hybrid applications are built with cross-platform frameworks like Ionic, React, Xamarin, and Sencha.
One advantage of hybrid applications is that they are highly faster and easier to develop as compared to a native application. Besides, they require lower maintenance than native apps. However, the hybrid apps’ speed and performance depend on your browser. Eventually, this denotes that hybrid apps fail to perform as fast as a typical native app.
Why are Native Apps Better than Hybrid Apps?
The Hybrid Vs Native app debate is quite conducive to discussing our topic comprehensively. Below is a chart that depicts the major differences between Native applications and Hybrid applications. The chart states why native applications are better as compared to hybrid applications in terms of performance, response, speed, following, development timeline, app ecosystem, and feature set.
Hybrid App VS Native App: Quick Facts
Read more for: Frameworks Used to Build Native Mobile Applications.
