my thoughts on the poster:
we keep winning and never ever lose

seen from Somalia
seen from China

seen from Uzbekistan
seen from China

seen from Malaysia
seen from Kazakhstan

seen from United States
seen from China

seen from United States
seen from Brunei

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from China

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from United States
my thoughts on the poster:
we keep winning and never ever lose
Red Toad - Schismaderma carens Soutpansberg Conservancy © pietersen_darren CC-BY-NC some rights reserved source
As the everyday use of AI has exploded in recent years, so have the energy demands of the computing infrastructure that supports it. But the
As the everyday use of AI has exploded in recent years, so have the energy demands of the computing infrastructure that supports it. But the environmental toll of these large data centers, which suck up gigawatts of power and require vast amounts of water for cooling, has been too diffuse and difficult to quantify.
Now, Cornell researchers have used advanced data analytics—and, naturally, some AI, too—to create a state-by-state look at that environmental impact.
The team found that, by 2030, the current rate of AI growth would annually put 24 to 44 million metric tons of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, the emissions equivalent of adding 5 to 10 million cars to U.S. roadways. It would also drain 731 to 1,125 million cubic meters of water per year—equal to the annual household water usage of 6 to 10 million Americans. The cumulative effect would put the AI industry's net‑zero emissions targets out of reach.
On the upside, the study also outlines an actionable roadmap that would use smart siting, faster grid decarbonization and operational efficiency to cut these impacts by approximately 73% (carbon dioxide) and 86% (water) compared with worst‑case scenarios.
The findings were published in Nature Sustainability. The first author is doctoral student Tianqi Xiao in the Process‑Energy‑Environmental Systems Engineering (PEESE) lab.
"Artificial intelligence is changing every sector of society, but its rapid growth comes with a real footprint in energy, water and carbon," said Fengqi You, the Roxanne E. and Michael J. Zak Professor of Energy Systems Engineering at Cornell Engineering, who led the project.
"Our study is built to answer a simple question: Given the magnitude of the AI computing boom, what environmental trajectory will it take? And more importantly, what choices steer it toward sustainability?"
In order to quantify the environmental footprint of the nation's AI computing infrastructure, the team began three years ago to compile "multiple dimensions" of financial, marketing and manufacturing data to understand how the industry is expanding, combined with location‑specific data on power systems and resource consumption, and how they connect with changes in climate.
"There's a lot of data, and that's a huge effort. Sustainability information, like energy, water, climate, tend to be open and public. But industrial data is hard, because not every company is reporting everything," You said. "And of course, eventually, we still need to be looking at multiple scenarios. There's no way that one size fits all. Every region is different for regulations. We used AI to fill some of the data gaps as well."
But projecting the impacts wasn't enough. The researchers also wanted to provide data‑driven guidance for sustainable growth of AI infrastructure.
"There isn't a silver bullet," You said. "Siting, grid decarbonization and efficient operations work together—that's how you get reductions on the order of roughly 73% for carbon and 86% for water."
By far, one of the most important factors: Location, location, location.
Many current data clusters are being constructed in water‑scarce regions, such as Nevada and Arizona. And in some hubs, for example northern Virginia, rapid clustering can strain local infrastructure and water resources.
Steve was trying his damndest to not cry again, but Eddie was making that damn near impossible. Not when he insisted on slow dancing to their damn wedding song in the middle of their living room- the masochist.
It was sickeningly romantic, and Steve wouldn’t have it any other way.
They were married. They were actually married. He had always been a sucker for shit like this. Always fantasizing about the day he would fall in love and live happily ever after.
He just never expected it to actually become his reality.
Maybe the marriage wasn’t “real” but Steve didn’t give a fuck. It was real in all the ways that mattered, and Steve was more than ready to be the first one to concede that a ceremony had been a great fucking idea. He was so grateful to have such weird control freaks in his life, especially the girls. It was without a doubt going down as one of the best days of his life, amazing enough for Steve to never want it to end.
He was so fucking happy, he didn’t even know what to do with himself. So he just clung onto Eddie tighter, burying his face into Eddie’s shoulder as he let the happy tears fall.
I have forgiven the Death Note characters for almost everything by now, but here is a list of things I still have NOT forgiven them for:
Light for calling himself "Lord Kira" when L first challenged him on TV
Light for thinking "Go meet your maker, lady!!" whenever he's trying to kill Naomi
Raye for being like "Why not use that brain of yours for more HOMEMAKER things" whenever Naomi tried to help him with the investigation
L for sprinkling crack on Misa's manager and then throwing her in prison
L for being like "It would be stupid af to lock up a suspect whenever they ask me to" the first time Light suggests it and then being like "Sure, why not" the second time he suggests it
L for the weirdo contraption and outfit he confines Misa in
Rem for suddenly deciding Light's a pretty cool guy, actually
Rem for both being like "No homo tho" to Misa and then also dying for straight rights
Light for making Aiber die slowly of cancer
Light for going "I need to tickle her just right" when thinking about how to manipulate Kiyomi
Matsuda for thinking it was epic that Light was cheating on Misa
Misa for throwing the board game at Mogi whenever she lost
Misa for making fun of Aizawa's nice haircut
Mello for killing like 90% of the SPK and Near for being like, but that's OK though when the SPK was mad about it
Mello for changing his Willy Wonka haircut
Near for never changing his pyjamas (that was L's thing, at least get some different patterns on the go)
Light for saying he wants to "top" the world during his Kira speech
i see all of you liking that les mis post
“These aren’t the droids you’re looking for.”
“Awesome.”
Nerd Dean confirmed
[via]