I got a little behind, again, with my Essay a Day project. I think it's at least partially because I was struggling so much to find things to say about the essays in Best American Essays 2007 that it made it hard to stay engaged. But, after getting that far in the book... I needed to see it through. So here are the last few I read:
Essay #14: "A Carnivore's Credo" by Roger Scruton from Harper's Magazine
This one gave an ethical argument for why people who care about animals have an ethical obligation to eat meat. The last paragraph sums it up pretty well:
I would suggest that it is not only permissible for those who care about animals to eat meat; they have a duty to do so. It meat eating should ever become confined to those who do not care about animal suffering, then compassionate farming would cease. Where there are conscientious carnivores, there is a motive to raise animals kindly. Moreover, conscientious carnivores show there depraved contemporaries that there is a right way and a wrong way to eat. Duty requires us, therefore, to eat our friends.
Essay #15: "What Should a Billionaire Give -- and What Should You?" by Peter Singer from The New York Times Magazine
This was a really good essay. Singer argues (and calculates) that if the world's richest 10 percent of Americans gave a comparatively small percentage of their wealth, we could eliminate world poverty. It was eye-opening.
Essay #16: "Dragon Slayers" by Jerald Walker from The Iowa Review
This is another essay I really liked. Walker, an African American writer, talks about a mentor from the Iowa Writer's Workshop who taught him how to write about African American life in a heroic way, and not to become complicit in stereotypes. I'm very curious to read Walker's memoir, Street Shadows, after finishing this essay.
Essay #17: "Apocalypse Now" by Edward O. Wilson from The New Republic
And finally... a secular humanist writes a letter to an evangelical pastor (and by extension, all evangelical Christians) and argues that science and religion can and should come together to save the environment. It doesn't really sound like a crazy proposition after you finish the essay.
And that's the end of my reading in Best American Essays 2007. I'll wait to share some concluding thoughts when I review the collection on my blog, but overall I didn't love this one. I thought too many of the essays had a political slant, and that a collection needs more variety. That said, I think every essay was chosen for it's ability to challenge the reader into thinking about the world differently, and I have to appreciate that.