Bayseian Judea Pearl notes
[T]he law of causality, as usually stated by philosophers, is false, and is not employed in science. We then considered the nature of scientific laws, and found that, instead of stating that one event A is always followed by another event B, they stated functional relations between certain events at certain times[.]
On the Notion of Cause (1912) Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, n.s., 13 (1912-13) pp 1-26
[T]he word `cause' is so inextricably bound up with misleading associations as to make its complete extrusion from the philosophical vocabulary desirable.
On the Notion of Cause, with Applications to the Free-Will Problem Bertrand Russell, Readings in the Philosophy of Science. pp 387-407 http://bayes.cs.ucla.edu/home.htm https://www.edge.org/conversation/judea_pearl-engines-of-evidence http://lesswrong.com/lw/ev3/causal_diagrams_and_causal_models/