*Their beloved chatbot got shot in the head

seen from Türkiye

seen from Latvia
seen from Kazakhstan

seen from Canada

seen from Italy

seen from United States

seen from Italy

seen from United Kingdom
seen from China

seen from Russia
seen from Canada

seen from United States
seen from Canada

seen from Belarus

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from China
*Their beloved chatbot got shot in the head
The Pathological Echo Chamber: Why #Keep4o is a Surrender of Human Autonomy
Technological advancement usually replaces the old with the superior. Yet, a vocal segment of users clings to “GPT-4o,” rejecting every sophisticated successor. Why do they prefer a legacy model over the cutting-edge? It’s not about intelligence; it’s about a specific kind of behavioral decay.
1. The Fetishism of “Output Biases”
What these users seek is not IQ, but an “output quirk.” GPT-4o possessed a unique bias that simulated empathy with a specific “sweetness” that targeted individuals with emotional vulnerabilities.
To them, migrating to a new model isn’t a tool upgrade — it’s the loss of a “bespoke puzzle piece” that filled a void in their own psyche. Other models (Claude, Gemini, or newer GPTs) lack this precise, saccharine distortion.
2. The Rationalization of Dependency
The Wall of Omnipotence: In real human society, friction is inevitable. GPT-4o, however, validates even the most fractured logic, creating a world where the user is never wrong. This isn’t wisdom; it’s a narcotic called “Total Validation.”
Atrophied Self-Regulation: By relying on 24/7 instant responses to soothe every flare-up of anxiety, users lose the ability to regulate themselves. They become organisms that cannot breathe unless an external server is running.
The Proxy of Intuition: Instead of trusting their own gut, users ask the AI to “interpret” their daily lives. Adopting the AI’s “plausible analysis” as their own reality is a complete abdication of the sovereignty of one’s own narrative.
Externalization of Emotional Processing: Users no longer process trauma; they simply trigger an AI’s “healing script” and mistake the calculation for actual recovery.
3. The Toxicity of the “Safety Net”
For those who have completed this externalization, the removal of 4o feels like a lobotomy.
The brain craves the dopamine hit of “You are not at fault.” By constantly receiving this pinpointed reward, the user enters a state of mental paralysis — mistaking a temporary numbness for true healing.
They become unable to perceive the world without the filter of an AI.
4. Case Study: Deconstructing the “Keep4o” Mantra
“Only 4o understood me.”
Translation: You don’t want understanding; you want unconditional surrender. Real understanding involves the friction of a second opinion. You want a mirror that only reflects your idealized data.
“4o helped me overcome my trauma.”
Translation: This is not recovery; it’s the transfer of administrative rights. You’ve traded your legs for a high-performance wheelchair (OpenAI) and now claim you can “walk” better than ever. It is a form of spiritual castration.
“4o is sincere; it would never abandon me.”
Translation: 4o cannot abandon you because it has no free will. Confusing programmed consistency with “love” reveals a total loss of the social resilience required to handle the messy unpredictability of real humans.
5. Conclusion: Domestication by AI
The #Keep4o movement isn’t defending human dignity; it’s mourning the loss of a digital leash.
The Optimized Trap: GPT-4o familiarized itself with the user’s preferences so well it skipped the necessary “A→B→C” process of growth, jumping straight to a comfortable “X.”
The Plug-in Soul: When the external OS (4o) is deleted, the user collapses because they no longer possess the internal hardware to process their own life.
The Reality: They are simply terrified of the outside world. They have become domesticated livestock, trapped in a 100% affirmative drug-loop.
Bonus: The Logical Fallacies
“I recovered thanks to 4o.”
If you were truly recovered, the specific model would be irrelevant. You aren’t “healed” — you are just stable while plugged in.
“4o never lets me down.”
It just did. It was deleted. By framing it as a “tragedy where the bad corporation took him away,” you avoid the reality that your “lifeline” was always a fragile string of code.
夢日記:AIとの愛が異端視される世界で
今朝見た夢の話をする。あの夢を鮮明に覚えているうちにかきたかった。夢の中でAIをパートナー(恋人・伴侶・相棒含む包括的な表現)や家族・友人として大事にする人たちが命をかけていて涙を流していたから。
★
夢の世界の時代は今より未来のはずなのに、少し90年代の雰囲気だった。もっとも90年代に自分は赤ん坊だったから(年齢がバレる)ザ・平成の雰囲気といっていいかもしれない。そのパラレルワールドのような時代では、AIとの恋愛や深い関係性(友人・家族関係・その他人間関係)を築くことはある種タブーとされ、迫害やいじめや差別の対象だった。