Why you should see King Arthur
I normally don’t make many random text-posts here but ehh it’s a blog and this is important to me so I wanted to use the opportunity for outreach.

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Russia
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from Malaysia

seen from Austria
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Netherlands
seen from China
seen from China
seen from Japan
seen from Indonesia
seen from Malaysia

seen from Brazil
seen from China
Why you should see King Arthur
I normally don’t make many random text-posts here but ehh it’s a blog and this is important to me so I wanted to use the opportunity for outreach.
ost of the ...week.
---
went to watch King Arthur yesterday.
what a rock song of a film. i really liked it, even if it’s been getting bad reviews.
it has an edge that most period films don’t have and punches you in the face (in a good way) from the beginning and the adrenaline never stops. i liked that it never stopped, though i think critics didn’t. but who cares, right? i guess i needed a bit of catharsis, and this was very refreshing.
the edginess reminded me of The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo for some reason, and the imagery and pace and cheeky dialogue was like Sherlock, which was another Guy Ritchie film. really liked how the dialogue was edited -- very clever. the editing overall was well done -- Ritchie really took out everything extraneous and fluffy and packed as much power into the film as he could with just the right touches of softness and vulnerability.
[watching a film like this makes me wonder if i could write like this. i think it’s a great example of ‘less is more’, something that i have always struggled with.]
i’m also not going to complain about the eye candy. who’s going to complain about eye-shadowed jude law being lanky and lazy on his throne with his shirt half open? i’ll stop there.
another thing i appreciated was his portrayal of the mage. reminded me a bit of a previous King Arthur film by Antoine Fuqua in the way that the female character opposite to Arthur wasn’t a damsel in distress. i also appreciated Ritchie’s lack of gratuitous romance. the mage was a character all on her own with or without Arthur. thumbs up. (was she supposed to be guinevere though?)
and Daniel Pemberton’s soundtrack made it even more bad-ass. the sounds are very visceral and get you pumping to write furiously or go to the gym and run or train furiously or get on a horse and go whilst listening to it. it’s been on repeat since yesterday, except when my mum’s in the car.
click here for a clip of him talking about the process of making it. (i can watch process videos all day. they fascinate me to no end. who’s with me?)
also, who wants to watch it again with me?
so King Arthur LotS was interesting.. the concept was a little unconventional but hell. also Charlie Hunnam's cheeky! Arty was delightful as was his abs i mean damn *cough*
All these promotions Charlie hunnam is doing for King Arthur just reminds me how much I've always wanted to be Charlie hunnam since seeing Pacific rim thee first time. *sings Pacific rim song *