#kusnilive

[dishwashingrat]

Your life ends in 1 day.

[sombrellas]

The bald edit is an inspiration

@kusnilive

[pugoata]

Is your name combination of a pug and goat?

It IS!! 😊 🐐 I love it when people catch onto that~

[sir-adamus]

How can that be "true Monty's vision" when they excluded Salem and Ozma's story, that was created before RWBY even existed? (an actual Monty's idea)

because theyre idiots who dont like that the show isnt going the way they thought it was and theyre putting words in the mouth of a dead man to justify their horseshit

[bloodraven55]

Hm now I don't know what to think about that cheek kiss. I have a feeling if that was supposed to mean something at least, they'd have adress it. But they just ignored it in commentaries and talked about animation or whatever, when the kiss happened. That doesn't really tell me "yo Blake's in love with Sun and she can't wait to make out with him in Vacuo"... At least this is how it feels to me, what do you think?

Yeah, I never expected them to talk about it so I’m not surprised they didn’t address it at all. It wasn’t significant, so they weren’t going to bring it up because there wouldn’t be much to say about it to be honest.

Obviously they’re not going to spoil anything or give really strong hints about what’s going to happen in the future, but the fact that they keep bringing up BB in very unsubtle ways and hyping it even more while BS is never even mentioned or supported in any way tells me everything I need to know lmao on top of everything already making it clear in the show.

[owletarc]

psa.

i won’t be discussing kusnilive any further on this blog. she apologised for her abusive bb art, the asks romanticizing suicide and the sun art; and while you reading this do not have to accept that apology if you don’t want to, i am. i don’t want to continue bad blood and bashing when someone has had the self reflection and time to realize when they’ve done something wrong. i apologised for my part in the cleo incident and know that it’s awful when it’s still used against me despite those plentiful apologies. i want to give her the same fairness. i don’t want my blog and this fandom to carry on being a hive of negativity about a person if they’ve apologised and keep to that apology  /  don’t repeat those harmful actions.

please do not bring her up in my asks or comment about her on my posts. my posts about her have been deleted and i wish her well, as someone who knows what it’s like when the stress of this site gets too much. we’re not friends by any stretch of the imagination but i do wish her better than what she’s had.

[short-wooloo]

A big what

Hey kusnilive, I tried to ask you this but there was too much text so here it is

Weird thing today, on FB I encountered someone in a BB group who made the claim that Blake had been stabbed by Adam 3 times, once before Beacon, and that was why her scar is crisscrossed, now of course there is no evidence for this, its not shown or said to have happened in the show, and I and others pointed this out, to which the person responded that we we’re missing things that only she was apparently seeing, that because at Argus Adam stabbed Blake in the same spot as Beacon that means he had done it before beacon (what?), and that Blake wouldn't be so scared of Adam if he wasn't physically abusive,

Now of course I don’t think it should need to be explained that you can fear someone very much without them being physically abusive, that’s the threat of violence or implying that violence would be used,

There’s also a bigger issue here, if Blake had been stabbed before Beacon by Adam, then why not bring it up as her reason for leaving the White Fang?  Why tell everyone that you left because of rising extremism?  Why would Blake still believe at the time that Adam ultimately had noble intentions if she had been stabbed by him?  Also stabbing someone isn’t abuse, that’s straight up attempted murder

This all resulted in the person who made the original post, shall we say, flipping out?  She said that I was unable to realize facts, and that it didn’t matter because I am a male and because a male’s ego is huge, therefore I didn’t realize what she did and I was just disagreeing out of ignorance (discounting my opinion while attempting to elevate her own), none of which is a refute, evidence for her point, or a counterargument against mine, merely attacking me a discounting my opinion (ad hominem), she then said she was in several other RWBY groups and made the same post, and that an admin had agreed with her so it had to be true, now I don’t understand how that makes her point valid (its a clear case of appeal to false authority), as admin on fan groups do not decide what is canon in a series, though she did say immediately after that the fact that an admin agreed with her was all that mattered to her, I doubt this is self-awareness but it does show that all she cared about was people agreeing with her

I think her problem with me was that I was using facts and evidence to take apart her argument while also asking that she provide proof to show that Blake already had a scar before beacon and that Adam was the one who gave it to her

side note: Why is Blake’s scar crisscrossed?  Because its a healed/sealed over hole, slashes that don’t cut deep create lined scars, stabbing through something makes a hole, especially a large sword, it tears open flesh, the crisscross is there because that’s how it healed/was stitched back together

[dishwashingrat]

I'm due process.