#legitquest

[advocateshishirprakash]

Delighted to share that I've been enlisted in the ForbesIndia Legal Powerlist 2021 among the Top Individual Lawyers (above 10 years of experience)! I dedicate this recognition to my Grandfather Late Sri Chandra Prakash, Advocate, District and Sessions Court Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh and My Father Late Sri. P. P. Srivastava, Senior Advocate, Former Addl Advocate General U.P. and President of Advocates' Association Allahabad High Court.

Thank you Forbes India , Legitquest and the esteemed members of the Jury for this initiative.

https://youtu.be/AC2HBLj5uno

[legalguide]

POCSO Act, 2012 (Protection of children from Sexual Offences Act) was introduced by the Ministry of Women and Child Development. Later in 2019, Smriti Irani introduced a bill to amend POCSO Act in Rajya Sabha to make the punishments more stringent.

[datasciencetalk]

Mohori Bibee and Ors Vs. Dharmodas Ghose on 04 March, 1903 - Legitquest

Mohori Bibee and Ors Vs. Dharmodas Ghose Judgment Dated 04-03-1903 of privy council having citation 30 M.I.A. 114 , include bench Judge Ho

[alc-law-college]

Asian Law College (ALC) Listed Top Law College by Forbes India | Asian LAW College

Asian Law College (ALC), Noida featured prominently as a TOP LAW COLLEGE in the LEGAL POWERLIST 2020, organized by Forbes India.

Asian Law College (ALC) – which is a part of Asian Education Group and is ranked as one of the top law colleges in Noida – has been enlisted under the first-ever LEGAL POWERLIST 2020 in 'TOP LAW COLLEGE' category, organized by Forbes India & Legitquest.

[letslegitquest]

B K Pavitra v Union of India, (2019) 16 SCC 129 wherein it had upheld the constitutional validity of the Karnataka Extension of Consequential Seniority to Government Servants Promoted on the Basis of Reservations

In the BK Pavitra I case, the Supreme Court had already declared the Karnataka 2002 Act [the Karnataka Determination of Seniority of the Government Servants Promoted on the Basis of the Reservation (to the Posts in the Civil Services of the State) Act] providing for consequential seniority along with reservation in promotions as unconstitutional on the ground of absence of any quantifiable data which is mandatory as per the M Nagaraj case.

[legalresearch]

Arnesh Kumar Vs. State Of Bihar Judgment Dated 02-07-2014 of Supreme Court of India having citation (2014) 2 ALT CRL. 457 (SC) , (2014) 210 DLT 599 (SC) , (2014) 2 GLR 1848 , 2014 (3) ACR 2670 (SC) , (2014) 3 KLJ 330 , (2014) 86 ACC 568 , AIR 2014 SC 2756 , 2014 (II) DMC 546 SC , 2014 (3) KHC 69 , 2014 (3) J.L.J.R. 313 , (2014) CRILJ 3707 , 2014 3 Bom CR CRI 362 , 2014 (VII) AD SC 697 , (2014) 2 GLH 547 , 2014 Supp (4) CHN 73 (SC) , 2014 (III) CCR 144 (SC) , (2014) 8 SCC 273 , 2014 (3) MLJ (CRL) 353 SC , (2014) 3 PLJR 314 , 2014 (6) SCJ 219 , 2014 (4) MPHT 81 (SC) , 2014 (3) JCC 1529 , (2014) 3 RCR (CRIMINAL) 527 , (2015) 1 LW CRL 318 , (2014) 3 RLW 2171 (SC) , JT 2014 (7) SC 527 , (2014) 3 KLT 143 (SC) , (2014) 3 KCCR 1977 (SC) , 2014 (IV) MPJR (SC) 55 , 2014 (8) SCALE 250 , include bench Judge HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASADHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE having Advocates For the Petitioner Rakesh Kumar, Kaushal Yadav, Advocates. For the Respondents Rudreshwar Singh, Samir Ali Khan, Aparna Jha, Braj K. Mishra, Abhishek Yadav, Advocates.

Know about Arnesh Kumar v. State Of Bihar Case -  Legitquest