i wonder if people find it confusing why gyakusai introduces some psuedo jury system in 4, drawing attention to the fact a jury never existed before, then its never mentioned again
the context is that it was included to introduce a judicial reform happening in japan in 2009 (gs4 was 2007)
there wasnt a jury at all before that, but this introduced a lay judge system, which is more similar to what they have in france and germany than common law juries (from the start japans legal system was more influenced by european civil law than english common law)
i got 'lay judge' from an english site about the japanese system, but ive also heard it for germany etc. (gyakusai only ever really mentions america. i suppose thats the famous one. i wouldnt be confident the writers know about any foreign legal systems other than america tbh, apparently the people who wrote the first game didnt even know prosecuters have badges in their own country)
the reason it was never brought up again might be partly for the sake of gameplay, and there wasnt a good story for it, and partly cause 5 was released like 5 years later. the lay judges were introduced to give more public input into the justice system, but there still seems to be issues with people being falsely accused
so even though gyakusai is just a mystery character drama that doesnt seriously deal with political issues on a deeper level, it went with reflecting the continued issues which arent related to lay judges. the way gyakusai handles legal stuff was never realistic or serious, but when it started including systemic issues as plot points in 4 5 and 6 you can see it gets obvious














