Influential though these systems were, they didn’t cause a programming revolution. I think one reason is simply that that they predated the internet. A live environment where you can connect computations together interactively is less interesting if the “universe” is a single process running on your local machine. If the universe is the global network with potentially billions of interacting agents, it’s a different story. Perhaps it’s an idea whose time has come.
dynamic aspects » Back to the future
While writings about changing the major paradigm of programming always catch my eye for a minute, they never make much of an impact. It isn't that I don't believe such a shift could be possible, or that I don't think it would be fantastic. I just don't think there will be a revolution. We'll evolve our techniques, as we have over the past decades, and one day my son (or grandson) will be reading a history book and realize "That's what they were talking about? I do that every day." And most of us may not have even noticed it.
This quote really struck me. It won't be a revolution, I still don't think that. But, I do think we know what has enabled the evolution.