Rodent model suggests that prenatal music appears to be beneficial for dams but detrimental for their offspring
Music has overarching influence in human life. For example, music is capable of inducing physiological responses such as as reducing anxiety and attenuating depression. Furthermore, music is thought to promote fetal development and human fetuses near the last trimester are known to respond to music with heart rate acceleration and motor responses (Kisilevsky, 2004; Al-Qahtani, 2005), since the prenatal period is characterized by its high sensitivity to environmental situations. Recently, there has been an increase in the amount of women who play music for their babies in utero, and images of a women wearing headphones around their pregnant bellies have become more common (just google pregnant women listening to music if you don't believe me). However, the effects of playing antenatal music in humans are controversial and evidence from controlled longitudinal studies is lacking...
To shed some light on this issue, Kubota and colleagues investigated the effects of prenatal music on maternal behavior and offspring behavior in rodents. In short, pregnant rats were exposed to 1 hour of Mozart (65dB) a day during the dark period while they were during the late gestational stage while control dams were exposed to a similar decibel ambient noise. The researchers found that music exposure increased the frequency of positive maternal behaviors following childbirth, as pregnant dams exposed to music during the late gestational period showed increased licking and grooming of their pups and decreased time spent away from their pups during the early neonatal period (PN3-6) compared to control mothers not exposed to music. Notably, this result is consistent with human studies suggesting that pregnant mothers who played music for or sing lullabies to their babies in utero report increased feelings of relaxation and attachment to their infant.
However, Kubota and colleagues found that although prenatal music exposure did not affect anxiety related behavior in the offspring, animals exposed to prenatal music showed increased depressive-like behavior in the Forced Swim Test 6 weeks after birth (i.e. PN45- adolescence), as indexed by increased time spent immobile as well as reduced swimming and climbing. Considering that the group assessed maternal behavior during the neonatal period and found enhanced maternal care in dams previously exposed to music, it seems unlikely that this adverse behavioral phenotype comes as a result of variations in maternal care. I'm not sure if this study will expand (and maybe assess neural correlates of this behavior) and become a publication, but it certainly makes you think twice about the effects of prenatal music and child development.
Anybody know of similar (i.e. longitudinal) studies done on human infants?
Al-Qahtani (2005). Foetal response to music and voice. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 45(5):414-7.
Kisilevsky, et. al. (2004). Maturation of fetal responses to music. Dev Sci. 7(5):550-9.
N. Kubota, Y. Takano, S. Yanagita, T. Matsuzawa, K. Takeda. The effects of prenatal music on maternal behavior and offspring behavior. Program No. 174.16/VV4-DP7.2013. Neuroscience Meeting Planner. San Diego, CA: Society for Neuroscience, 2013. Online.