#maybe 9 onymous

[alivechihiro]

stop being a fucking faggot and just block those people

i did block them, asshole

they're still harassers and i want them to unfollow me

[alivechihiro]

if you know who i am, then go ahead and educate me. send me a pm or something - after you sleep. you're fine at educating; you just seem to jump to off-putting conclusions too quickly and brush off concerns. i don't view you as a face of the movement - just someone who can give an opinion from someone whose inside of it. that's more valid than a "face" or a leader, since their opinions must reflect the mass majority.

mm, all right

as i've said, i'm not good at educating, so i might not be very helpful

i'm going to turn anon off now, though, since i'm not into waking up to bullshit from le reddit hivemind who seems to have popped in while we were talking

[alivechihiro]

because social anxiety is a joke to you too, huh? it always is - anonymity is always associated with cowardice, isn't it? anyway - i was just asking for your personal opinion because you seem knowledgeable. it is important to put a face on a movement, on issues - to humanize it - so i thought talking to a person about it might clear it up, as a genuine response provides more insight than formal text. i am sorry that you are tired, but being so open about these things... surely you must expect it

to be honest? my personal opinion isn't going to be that useful. i'm not an authority or leader or anything of that kind, i just ramble my thoughts a lot. i'm not qualified to be the face of the movement in any sense.

i understand that you have anxiety. i too have anxiety (stemming from my autism). i know it's not a joke, and i'm not making fun of you for it. i'm not calling you a coward, i'm not telling you i won't answer questions unless you come off anon. 

i'm just. really tired right now and not up to this, i need to go to bed.

[alivechihiro]

wow, no need to be a jerk about it - the search engine. anyway, who cares if it's a "social construct" or not? everything is a social construct, because we are human - everything we think and discover are social constructs. if that's the case, why does the name one attaches to oneself even matter? i do not see what the problem with generalizations is, as the human brain cannot even maintain more than 100 relationships. i do not understand what this sexuality and gender movement stands for, now.

sighs extremely loudly

i am under no obligation to educate anons. or anyone really, but especially anons.

there already exist plenty of resources. my blog is not your only source; its availability as a source is tied directly to my patience, my energy, and my desire to spread knowledge, none of which are infinite resources, and all of which are draining real fast right now.

[alivechihiro]

biology isn't real? i'm very confused. "male" and "female..." ah, not sexes, but... let's go with "entities," appear throughout nature. some species are very fluid, others are not... but there does seem to be a very common trend of two. now, gender is a construct, because humans have elevated beyond that of animals or plants, and shouldn't be defined by "male" and "female..." but, even in humans, isn't say "male" people having prostate cancer a very real and very biological thing?

no see

"male" people do not get prostate cancer

people with prostates get prostate cancer

there are amab folk, cis men even, who do not have a prostate and will never get cancer in that zone on account of there being no zone

honestly i need to go to sleep and all this has been pretty well explained elsewhere and here is a marvelous tool to look into that yourself

[alivechihiro]

should i even matter if it was in response in to anything? anyway - yes, but if you are a sexual person, a person's genitalia might matter a lot. biology is important, in that regard, as a person who maybe has been traumatized or something by a penis might not want to have sex and therefore (if they are a sexual person) not want to engage in a relationship with someone whose genitalia is a penis. it has the opportunity to harm and cause problems, doesn't it? if one writes off biology

the message was phrased as a response to something, so... *shrugs* at this point it doesn't matter i guess, the conversation is going regardless of how it started

someone's genitals might matter for whatever reason (and i'm not thinking to invalidate any of that) but "biological sex" isn't the indicator you're looking for because like i just said a moment ago there are amab folk without dicks and afab folk with them. (srs is a thing and all) so like if dicks are a problem, what the delivery doctor put on their birth certificate is insufficient evidence to be sure. 

the point of all that isn't that biology isn't real (social constructs are real too, after all) but that "biological sex" specifically is really poorly constructed, to the point that it doesn't really work very well.

[alivechihiro]

what about the people who really don't like dicks or really don't like vaginas. like. isn't it kinda shitty to do that to cis lesbians and gay dudes. i mean they don't even have to be cis sexuality and romantic attraction are very different things

... i literally have no clue what this is in response to, because if it's about the 'biological sex' post it's a complete non sequitur

if you for whatever reason don't like a certain form of genital, don't touch or look at them. that's the beginning, middle, and end of that.

[alivechihiro]

Same anon as on Kat's blog: Because social justice blogs don't deserve the same discrimination as anti social justice blogs? No, they deserve more. It's bad social justice.

...

i'm sorry, i'm having trouble parsing this message

are you suggesting that anti-sj/~real justice~ blogs need less scrutiny than pro-sj blogs, simply by virtue of being labeled anti-sj/~real justice~ ?

because if so, you are very very wrong, friendo