Digital Citizenship 3: conflict and social media
Social media is modern tool for communication, which spreads info and connects folks terribly speedily. Meanwhile, its role in the conflict and post-conflict situations isn't properly appreciated. Existing studies and researches mostly underline negative role of media throughout conflicts, few ones focus on the role of social media within the reconciliation and post-conflict reconstruction activities, trust building processes. Social media is a powerful tool and new opportunity for conflict resolution. During last decade civil societies, activists, representatives of the governments and political parties actively use it as a communication means with their audiences.
In the post-conflict situations social media becomes early warning system. People will right away post news regarding affairs in the conflict zones. Georgian and international organizations train and equip people in such areas to report regarding their everyday lives or suddenly emerged threats. Online portals, networks, blogs, Facebook groups serve as a superb data sources regarding conflict regions. They connect people from completely different sides; replicate daily happenings of the refugees or peace initiatives. In other words, social media is a rapid and effective communication mechanism for the conflict regions.
well, the conflict on social media can be considered as the factors below:
Political system of the country, legal or informal environment, which determines functioning of social media tools and freedom of expression. They can promote or limit on-line communication.
Accessibility of the technologies. Reporting from the hot spots is not possible while not web and individual technical base (smartphones, laptops, cameras, etc.).
Literacy level of the country. Social media activities are high in the countries, population of which has individual technologies, as well as knowledge and skills for social media usage.
Credibility – social media is not shielded from the unfold of info and info. The article “Confession of Russian Troll” published on the web site of Radio Freedom (April 2015) reflects the theme a way to manipulate individuals by social media. Sometimes it is laborious to see that news is true or false.
It all started when a teenage girl named Casey Syler decided to visit a fashion store in South Carolina to shop for a new wallet. According to Casey, as soon as she walked through the doorway a saleswoman looked up and allegedly said “Shoplifter” to one of her colleagues. For context, Casey is black.Casey’s mother Rene (a successful blogger) shared the experience on her Facebook page. The post went viral, which prompted an appropriately contrite response from Carolina Girls on their Facebook page. Left there, the fire would have been extinguished and everyone could have moved on. But the store later posted a further Facebook message claiming an investigation had unearthed no evidence of any such comment being made, pinning the blame on ‘young shoppers’ in the store at the time.The post inevitably poked a hornets’ nest that had begun to settle down. The store’s page was bombarded with critical comments, many of which were deleted by the page admin. To compound their mishandling of the situation, Carolina Girls ended up deleting their entire Facebook profile.The owner of the chain brought further attention to the unfortunate saga by speaking to a news channel. Stephanie Davis insisted she had attempted to set up a meeting with Rene Syler and her daughter, but the horse had already bolted and the interview simply succeeded in attracting more online scorn.
Carolina Girls initially did the right thing by publicly apologising and reaching out to the aggrieved party privately. But inexplicably they then inflamed the situation by insisting they were not at fault and censoring negative comments rather than engaging with an angered online populous. Deleting their page was akin to an ostrich sticking its head in the sand with a pride of lions closing in.
Be open and contrite from the outset, try to take the issue out of the public domain, and make sure your response is sufficient to throw a blanket over the fire. If not, you risk a full-scale wildfire – which will be much harder to extinguish and could irreparably damage your brand.
JoJo Maman Bebe is a UK-based baby clothes retailer targeted at mothers with large disposable incomes. Its premium prices have led to a number of second-hand selling groups being established on social media. One such group, JoJo Maman Bebe Pre-Loved Buy and Sell, has more than 20,000 members. Its popularity was clearly seen as an irritant by the company itself, and culminated in its founder posting a late-night message on the page questioning why users would want to pay near full price for her company’s products.
“Why anyone would pay near to full price or full price sometimes plus postage for something second hand is crazy,” wrote Laura Tenison. “We don’t charge postage so you could get a new one for less!” The response from the group’s members was predictable, with the message being described variously as ‘incredibly rude’, ‘snotty’ and an ‘epic PR fail’.
Tenison’s response was rapid, contrite and relatable. “Late-night posting is never a good idea,” she said. “I had just come back from watching Trainspotting 2. I’m human and I made a mistake.”
She apologised to the group’s members in a subsequent post, “You are wrong if you think I am condescending towards this group. I LOVE IT. Of course it is up to you to pay what you like but I often see prices which are higher than our sale prices, plus you pay postage! I do think this is a bit daft – but it’s up to you and I accept none of my business.”
First of all, this example emphasises the importance of a robust social media approval process. No matter how important they think they are, company owners or CEOs should not be permitted to post personal messages in the name of the brand. Else why bother hiring a marketing team or agency?
However, if a big cheese does open a can of worms, it has to be their responsibility to close it. Bringing in the brand account to clean up the mess will only make it look like the boss is hiding – which will inevitably invite more criticism. Tenison handled it well, admitting to making a mistake in a way we can all relate to. She quelled the backlash and earned the group 4,000 new members in the process.
Blaise, 2011, ’16 causes of conflict in an online community’, Social Media Today, viewed 24 October 2018, <https://www.socialmediatoday.com/content/16-causes-conflict-online-community>.
Wilkes, D 2017, ‘Babywear boss in the late-night facebook rant at her yummy mummy customers: JoJo Maman Bebe chief attacks members of group who sell clothes on once infants have outgrown them ’, dailymail.co.uk, viewed 24 October 2018, <https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-4194402/JoJo-Maman-Bebe-chief-attacks-customers-Facebook.html>.
Vaughan, S 2018, ‘uk-BASED maternity wear and baby clothing retailer opens in Westport’, Westport News, viewed 23 October 2018, <https://www.westport-news.com/news/article/UK-based-maternity-wear-and-baby-clothing-12884916.php>.
Jones, L 2018, ‘6 examples of social media crises: what can we learn?’, oursocialtimes.com, viewed 22 October 2018, <https://oursocialtimes.com/6-examples-of-social-media-crises-what-can-we-learn/>.
Eqbal, V 2014, ‘Social media & global conflicts: #Binary Battles’, The Express Tribune, viewed 22 October 2018, <https://tribune.com.pk/story/772284/social-media-global-conflicts-binarybattles/>.