I think a big mistake in my approach to posting is the wishful thinking that my ideas could ever have quickly consumable popular appeal, especially among people who haven't already put in a lot of effort to think.
For a few years now, I've been chasing the ideal of a Concise Post for each building-block idea in my mind that I don't see spoken/named or properly abstracted in popular conversation/thinking.
If only I could distill my ideas into single-screen-sized chunks, then more people would actually read and share them.
If only I could give my ideas crisp names, people could easily refer to them in thought and in conversation.
If only I could precisely tune the name for the required level of accessibility and precision, they would resist nuance decay and misuse to the right degree.
If only, if only, if only....
Profit! (My ideas catch on, people get exposed to them, especially when they're younger and still have more opportunity to grow and avoid various problems and make the world better than they otherwise would've with their ripples.)
But the truth is, I don't think this really works. Or rather, I don't think that hope is fully reachable. I think I've done a decent job within those constraints, and it really helped me become a better writer, but so often I look back at these short posts and feel like they're too reduced - husks of what they could be.
One of the ideas was to write a second, fully elaborated post for each idea, and put it on @mentalisttraceur-long. I do think that would help, and that's still a goal, but I have yet to get around to it.
But that's precisely the problem: the ideas I am most equipped to contribute are often ideas that demand a larger entry fee than these tiny posts could contain, and trying to appeal to the people who need it to fit on a single screen might just be sacrificing what I'm trying to say for the sake of the wrong audience.