Vulnerable landscape
Using middle landscape as a source for getting our commodities while at the same time leaving dross behind, even destroying nature as is the case with most of the used middle landscape, is coming to an end. Sadly, not everywhere - yet. It is funny to think that with securing wilderness with National Parks and such or even with random birocratical directions such as Natura 2000, we feel better while at the same time carelessly using landscape that has no ''medal of ecological beauty''. Reusing drosscape and making new habitats is legit if the community understands what is happening. We shall not make it a common practice and thinking that if one habitat is reused and even better, restored, that we can then destroy one at the same time. That way, landscape is even more vulnerable because it is clearly being manipulated. If we strive to leave nature and only reuse what has been destroyed in the past while at the same time doing restorations and developing new technologies that will help new uses of reused landscape to not produce dross after a few 10 years, than we are doing it the right way in my opinion. In this case, nature is not vulnerable.