#missed something

[1800violetcrave]

does awsten not like when we call him aws???

[serdunkthelunk]

Okay google how to hit a point in your life where after every conversation you ever have you don't immediately feel like you missed a few esoteric unknowable vital steps of human social interaction somehow

[burningflash]

Waiting for a visa application to be processed 10 days before you're meant to leave has to be a top ten stress experience

[kiwidotcom]

Slept through my alarm and missed something important

🎉

[peculiary]

All-New Inhumans #3 January 27, 2016

[pettydavis]

i really hate that theyve made peter look up to tony stark when honestly his feelings about him in the comics have been ambivalent at best

[ackleholics]

oh um okay?

Er? what?

?!?!?!??@?#!@#?!@?$!@?$@!??!@$?

[mlmhumantorch]

Marvel Questions: If it was revealed that Norman Osborn was back to his 'normal' self again and he was keeping Peter and Mary Jane's child (baby May) shortly after her birth a few years ago and had raised her as his own, what would your reactions be? What do you think comic fandom's reactions be? And finally, what would you and fandom's reactions be if Norman didn't treat the kid badly and generally love her?

I would be so confused, and i think for awhile i wouldnt really know how to react? but i think i’d also be interested to see exactly where the writers would be going with that. Most of the fans would probably freak out, since of course norman osborn is The Actual Worst™, and this wouldn’t be the first time it was revealed that norman raised peter’s children (Although technically the time when that first happened they were actually norman and gwen’s children, and that was just all sort of fucked up) and if norman didn’t actually treat the kid badly and loved her? i feel like that would just lead up to norman raising her to become the next green goblin or something weird like that, because idk in my brain norman osborn and actually loving and caring for a child without ulterior motives don’t mix