#dc comics#batman#dc#bruce wayne#dc universe#dick grayson#batfam#dc fanart#tim drake#batfamily
seen from Ukraine
seen from United Kingdom
seen from China
seen from China
seen from Malaysia
seen from Belgium
seen from Côte d’Ivoire
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from China
seen from Yemen
seen from Singapore
seen from United States
seen from Singapore
seen from China
seen from Nepal
seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from Russia
i wonder how error would look like in myebi's art style…their art style is just so gorgeous..
AAA guys i'm so sorry for the lack of posting..I just finally have free time from work and i'm making the things i want to do for me first! It's not like it's my job to post here but i start thinking that people will start unfollowing me bc i'm not posting LOL, it doesn't matter if people unfollow me..i just want people to appreciate my art!
so excited for this year inktobertale..i hope i'll not be too busy! Inktobertale is probably the thing i'm most excited about bc this year has been so shitty to me lol
i love to draw ink in my style but the rendering is on myebi's style...it makes him so unique and different from the other sanses..
i like to think that dream and nightmare have the same basic necessities humans have bc they're not supposed to be skeletons...they were supposed to be humans...I also find quite interesting the idea of making their skulls different from other sanses too...ok they don't have bodies but i can clearly see dream craving for some italian food, idk i just think he likes it..
UWAAA GUUUYSS!! I'm really happy and so grateful for all the nice comments on my art...I don't draw often (mostly because i'm busy from work) but i have been working on some things! Can't wait to finally show my Undertale AU :-)
Me: gives Mitch no dialogue except for maybe one word bc I’m too afraid to get it wrong
Me: reads one fic with good Mitch dialogue
Me: wants to take down my entire fic just posted and rewrite for Mitch
Moral relativism is not moral nihilism
In my time on the internet, I have observed and participated in many discussions concerning ethics. Among the most recuirent ideas that have being levied at me is that without some kind of metaphysical framework for ethics, how can I justify any ethical position I may hold on any given issue. In other words, if morality is a human construct, what gives me the right to make value judgements from my construction over that of a rapist, murder or so forth.
From a rudimentary view, this question is not completely invalid. Without reference to some kind of framework outside of human opinion, why should we take any ethical consideration at all? This however, assumes a false dichotomy.
Like all primates, human beings are social animals. Every single one of us depends on other human beings to survive. Communities exist as a pool for human resources. In order to draw apon the resources of other people within the community, a level of co-operation is necessary. As a result of this, a contract is implied for all members of the community. This "contract" is essentially one of mutual benefit.
Organisation necessitates co-operation. Co-operation implies that all members involved will behave in a manner that is conductive of the mutual benefit of all involved. A community is human co-operation on a large scale, therefore a community necessitates behavour that is conductive of the survival of other members of that community. Thus the community as a whole can survive and fulfil its purpose.
The reason I can justify certain activities as "right or wrong", is because certain activities are not conductive of the overall survival of human community in which I live. This in turn affects my survival and thus feel justified to make value judgements of right and wrong.
Right and wrong my not exist objectively, how can it? However that does not mean that the construct of morality is invalid. It is in human best interest to chastise activities and behaviours it deems "negative" based on their negitive effects on the group as a whole. This is not to say however that all value judgements ever made by humans are justifiable. It is a construct that can be distorted like any other.
The problem as I see it in terms to an objective ethics, is the question concerning tangibility. How can an intangible exist outside of the minds in which the intangible can be percived? I believe such a position requires a metaphysics that is simply untenable at this time. Even if such a metaphysics does exist, it still would not follow that ethics can be objective. One example concerning the problem with theistic justifications is the classic Euthyphro's dilemma.
