Miwon Kwon - One Place After Another - Ch. 1 “Genealogy of Site Specificity”
I was already vaguely familiar with Kwon’s work, but it made sense to dive deeper and I will record notes on each chapter. I like this book, although it was written in 2004 and is a bit dated now.
Summary: Kwon identifies the emergence of site specificity and explains that it’s a response to modernist, object-based aesthetics, commercial systems, etc. She identifies some early SS artists, including Smithson and Serra, and how early on, SS was explicitly tied to a specific space and to move a SS piece would be to ruin it.
She also talks about Institutional Critique as site specificity, and talked about how artists like Haacke, Buren, and Ukeles draw attention to the specific frame of the institution, and issues of value, narrative, seen and unseen labor. Here we’re still working with a physical place, but the narrative is political, it’s not just about a location, it’s about a system of power/economy.
And then she talks about artists like Fred Wilson who work with multiple sites, and multiple disciplines (the sciences, popular culture, etc) who conceptualize the site as not a physical location, but as a discourse, a suite of themes, etc. And then she goes on to mention how these ideas morph in other chapters to become more theoretical and complex.
Key notes/phrases/quotes etc:
Institutional critique:
“The seemingly benign architectural features of a gallery/museum...actively disassociate the space of art from the outside world, furthering the institution’s idealist imperative of rendering itself and its values ‘objective,’ ‘disinterested,’ and ‘true.’“ (13)
Some SS/IC practices are “aggressively antivisual--informational, textual, expositional, didactic...” (24)
Museums are in some ways meta-sites:
“...the site comes to encompass a relay of several interrelated but different spaces and economies, including the studio, gallery, museum...that together constitute a system of practices that is not separate from but open to social, economic and political pressures.” (14)
Moving to a more complex theorization of site:
“...the site is now structured (inter)textually rather than spatially...” (29)
Paradigms of site-specificity that are not discrete, but rather, often overlapping: “phenomenological, social/institutional, and discursive.” (30)













