Why you shouldn’t avoid using the word ‘aromantic’ to describe your aromantic characters
We get a lot of questions on this blog that mention a difficulty conveying to readers that a character is in fact aromantic, and I feel like I need to point out, as nicely as I can, that ‘aromantic’ isn’t a bad word.
It’s not impossible for there to be a scenario where using the word aromantic isn’t necessary. What is necessary is erring on the side of caution, because aros are still very much an invisible group. You cannot say of an aro character ‘they don’t date’ and have readers know what that means in the same way you can say of a gay character ‘he only dates boys.’
Aromantics can guide you on how best to describe our orientation without saying the word aromantic, but it is not helping us for you to try and use any euphemism you can before you call us by the actual term for what we are.
I understand not wanting to use modern terms in a fantasy setting, but using an orientation term won’t take audiences out of the story the way saying ‘twitter’, or ‘nuclear power’ will. There aren’t equivalents of twitter in (most) fantasy worlds. There can be a word for aromantic, and your readers will just assume that’s been translated from whatever fantasy language your characters are speaking into whatever language they’re reading the book in.
Everything in fantasy is translated. Unless they wouldn’t have a version of the thing you’re talking about, please just use whatever words you like. Don’t let a warped idea of accuracy get in the way of an underrepresented group seeing themselves in the media.
(Especially when, as pointed out many times to male writers who use ‘accuracy’ as a reason not to let women fight, fantasy isn’t realistic. You have dragons in this book, you can have aros. Please don’t be that male writer everyone hates.)
Historical fiction is a little different, but unless you’re writing something with zero anachronisms that is meant to be completely serious, I’d rather an ahistorical term be used than aromanticism be erased.
I know I’ve reassured people before than canonising a character’s orientation via word of god is always possible, but I also want to stress that that should really be a last resort. The few aro characters we have are erased 99% of the time even by people who already know about their canonical, word of god, aromanticism. We need the most explicit canonisation possible, because people do not respect us. Unless you’re willing to personally argue with every fan online making ship art of your word of god aro, please consider that route to be a cop out you take when there are literally no other options.
I know that sometimes, it is genuinely difficult to make a character’s aromanticism clear, especially in cases where access to the word might be difficult or inaccurate. But the amount of asks we get about how to make it obvious a character is aro, when in the context the asker has given about their story it wouldn’t be necessary to go without the word, is worrying.
Please don’t act like ‘aromantic’ is a word to be avoided at any cost. It allows us to be erased even when we should be represented, and frankly it makes me feel like even our allies don’t want to support us explicitly.
- Mod Kaladin















