Irã DESTRÓI navio de guerra dos EUA no Estreito de Ormuz, Pentágono no CAOS, Trump SILENCIOSO | Mohammad Marandi
Neste vídeo, o professor Mohammad Marandi oferece uma análise crítica sobre as recentes tensões no Estreito de Hormuz, defendendo a perspectiva iraniana frente ao que ele descreve como um cerco naval e agressão imperialista liderada pelos Estados Unidos. Abaixo estão os pontos principais da discussão:
Contexto e Ações no Estreito:
O professor argumenta que as ações do Irã no Estreito de Hormuz não são provocações, mas uma resposta estratégica e soberana a um bloqueio naval ilegal imposto pelos EUA (0:00 - 1:04).
Ele esclarece que o Irã não fechou o Estreito para todos, mas restringiu o tráfego de nações que ele considera co-beligerantes, por fornecerem infraestrutura para ataques contra o território iraniano (9:45 - 10:30).
Crítica à Política Externa dos EUA:
Marandi descreve o projeto imperial dos EUA como destrutivo e cita o histórico de apoio a regimes regionais e o enfraquecimento de estados independentes (3:58 - 7:00).
Critica a retórica de Donald Trump e a cobertura da mídia ocidental, que ele descreve como conivente com ameaças genocidas e ações militares (1:41 - 2:50).
Capacidade Militar e Estratégica do Irã:
O Irã teria desenvolvido um robusto programa de defesa, incluindo mísseis de precisão e infraestruturas subterrâneas (7:11 - 7:51).
Ele menciona o uso de decoy (iscas) durante o conflito como uma estratégia eficaz para enganar e frustrar os ataques dos EUA e de Israel (8:53 - 9:40).
Implicações Globais e Econômicas:
O professor alerta para uma crise econômica global iminente, impulsionada pelo preço da energia e pelo fechamento de rotas marítimas vitais, como Hormuz e Babel Mandeb (16:26 - 18:13).
Acredita que o mundo está vivendo uma transição irreversível de uma ordem unipolar para uma multipolar, onde a credibilidade militar e diplomática dos EUA está em declínio (23:38 - 25:00).
İran'ın Müzakerelerdeki Kararlılığı ve Nükleer Politikaları
İranlı uluslararası ilişkiler uzmanı ve Tahran Üniversitesi profesörü Mohammad Marandi, Valdai Tartışma Kulübü etkinliğinde İran-ABD müzakerelerine dair önemli açıklamalarda bulundu. Marandi, “Daha önce de belirttiğim gibi, İran askeri gücü ve savunma kapasitesi, regional müttefikleri ve nükleer programı veya uranyum zenginleştirmesi konusunda kimseyle müzakere etmeyecek. İran’ın yapmaya hazır…
İran'ın Müzakerelerdeki Kararlılığı ve Nükleer Politikaları
İranlı uluslararası ilişkiler uzmanı ve Tahran Üniversitesi profesörü Mohammad Marandi, Valdai Tartışma Kulübü etkinliğinde İran-ABD müzakerelerine dair önemli açıklamalarda bulundu. Marandi, “Daha önce de belirttiğim gibi, İran askeri gücü ve savunma kapasitesi, regional müttefikleri ve nükleer programı veya uranyum zenginleştirmesi konusunda kimseyle müzakere etmeyecek. İran’ın yapmaya hazır…
Why the U.S. LOSES a War with Iran: Mohammad Marandi on Scott Ritter & Trump's Nuclear Threats
115,354 views Apr 7, 2025 #iran#trump#israelDonald Trump has made a strategic mistake in escalating war with Iran says Prof. Mohammad Marandi. In this must-watch video, Prof. Marandi breaks down what US provocations will lead to and busts the myths about Iran's nuclear program being used to justify the US & Israel's path toward self-destruction. FOLLOW ME ON X: https://x.com/SpiritofHo FOLLOW ME ON RUMBLE: https://rumble.com/c/DannyHaiphong FOLLOW ME ON TELEGRAM: https://t.me/dannyhaiphong
Transcript
0:00iran right now is standing very defiant to Trump's war escalation amid all of
0:05this liberation day hype and it's not cowtowing to the presence of war plananes and ships that are heading its
0:11way and it's promising reciprocal blows and even the rapid buildup of nuclear
0:17weapons development should it be necessary is the US and Israel right now
0:23professor Rody sewing the seeds for their demise or is this catastrophic war that's to come that is building up going
0:29to lead to Iran's ultimate defeat you know I have fought in war since I was 16
0:36i was a volunteer and u I went and fought on and off few months every year
0:43as a volunteer until the war ended six years later it was an eight-year long
0:49war but the first two years I was too young to be able to volunteer when I was 16 I volunteered and since I was still
0:55young I had to give a sort of exam or I was interviewed and and I was allowed to
1:01go and fight um so you know if I could go to Gaza I would go to Gaza if I could
1:07go to Lebanon I'd go to Lebanon if I could go to Syria I'd go to Syria because if it's something I believe in
1:14I'd fight for and of course Yemen the same but war is horrible i mean that is there's no doubt
1:21about it uh I I hate war if I have to fight a war I'll fight a war but if but
1:27I hate war uh I don't want war but I
1:32believe that the United States would lose a war with Iran everyone would lose i mean the
1:38world would lose war is horrible as I said the war in Ukraine is a loss for Russia and it's a loss for Ukraine it's
1:45a loss for the West but the loss for Russia is less than the West and that's why Russia's winning relatively speaking
1:52Russia comes out on top uh we predicted that from the very beginning many of us
1:57you yourself me and some of our friends but war is still horrible and
2:03it's a loss for everyone so um I don't want war to happen but uh it's not
2:10something that the Islamic Republic of Iran is going to be fearful of it will it does not
2:18want war but if it has to confront the United States it will confront the United States and I think we've already
2:26seen that um Trump sent a letter which
2:31had an implicit threat the Iranians said "No we're not going to negotiate we're not going to have direct talks."
2:37And the Iranian said "As usual just as in the past we are prepared to have
2:42indirect talks which we've always have had with Trump and with previous
2:49administrations." Trump uh we we've heard over the last couple of days in
2:55the media that uh the the Trump team or Trump they're thinking about the Iranian
3:01proposal for indirect negotiations uh that's not a proposal the Iranians never proposed that iran
3:07has said it's willing to continue in direct negotiations we've already been doing that so there's nothing new there
3:14but the very fact that they put it this way and they've said it in the media or they've said it through the media I
3:21think indicates that it is possible that the that Trump wants an offramp he he he
3:27he wants the opportunity to deescalate at least for now that may not be true or
3:33may be true until tonight when he tweets something new because that's how Trump works he says one thing that the next
3:39day it's something else this whole uh tariff saga
3:47uh you know we've we've heard different things it's been you know with Canada the United States Mexico the United
3:53States it it keeps changing and then suddenly and then finally today we got uh a list that that's different or the
4:01percentages are different from what they were it was going to be earlier and it may evolve again tomorrow so there's no
4:08Trump is not a very stable person he's not stable at all so if we say that he's
4:14seeking for an off-ramp that means that he may be seeking for an offramp today but not necessarily
4:21tomorrow but that of course is the one of the one of the reasons why Iran can't negotiate with Trump because we can we
4:30can't trust anything that he says if he says he'll agree to something today he
4:35may change his mind tomorrow look at what happened in Gaza the day before he
4:40came to power he his he negotiated or his people
4:46negotiated the ceasefire and we were told that his representative went and
4:52told Netanyahu to sit down and shut up and do as we say remember it was on a
4:59Saturday and Netanyahu's office uh supposedly said uh that he you know
5:05cannot he cannot meet anyone today and and so on and he was forced to do so but
5:10then what happened we were told he's a man of peace he wants to end the this holocaust
5:17and then he said Palestinians must leave the the deal that he negotiated
5:25uh the deal that he is the guarantor he is saying the Palestinians must leave
5:30that that's that's totally against the deal and then later on he gives the green
5:36light to Netanyahu to restart the the mass slaughter of women and
5:41children so how can we negotiate with Trump so whether you know the there are
5:49two there are two issues here one is can Trump defeat Iran or will Iran defeat
5:55the United States will the war will the world lose what will happen that's one question the second is okay war is
6:02tragic but how can we negotiate with this guy how can we sit down and talk with him
6:10when he changes his mind every day the United States does that it's not just
6:17him you saw for example uh the not just the Minsk accords but
6:23the Estanbul negotiations that could have ended the war three years ago the war in Ukraine who who pushed Zaninski to quit
6:34the talks it was the previous British prime
6:40minister but who was he speaking on behalf of it was the United States so
6:45negotiations Minsk Accords the JCPOA the United States never fulfilled
6:51their side of the bargain when they signed in the JCPOA under Obama it wasn't just Trump who
6:58tore up the deal obama was violating the deal from day one even though Iran was fully committed but Trump is even worse
7:06so the question is can we even negotiate i think the question is the
7:12answer to that is at least for now no there's no one to
7:18you know there's there's no one in Washington who you can speak with and to be and you could be sure that what he
7:24says matters or what he says will be carried
7:30out but if there's war and this is where my friends Scott Ritter and I have a
7:37disagreement because we had a a Twitter exchange a few days ago some I think
7:43some of our friends probably read them like we had 20 10 15 20 tweets that went
7:48back and forth on two three different occasions scott was saying basically
7:53that Iran should give up its sovereignty a sovereign right to a nuclear program
7:58because uh Trump will destroy Iran and my response was that
8:07uh first of all if you accept that logic then even
8:13if Iran gives up its nuclear program its missile defense capabilities its allies
8:18across the region why shouldn't Trump go further he has a nuclear weapon he can
8:24threaten Iran based on Trump's logic on uh Scott's logic and he can have the
8:32keys to Tehran he can go as far as he wants and then that's what the neocons want
8:38so I don't see it that as acceptable first of all the Iranians would
8:44never allow their sovereignty to be taken away from them it's part of their religious culture it's part of their
8:51identity anyone who knows about Imam Hussein and Kabala the grandson of the
8:57prophet anyone who knows how when the the the despot of his time of his era
9:04wanted him to submit he said meaning never to humiliation that
9:12is that is a key part of our Muslim Iranian
9:18uh Shia identity every year for those who know you know when they commemorate Ashur and
9:27the march with them of the grandson of the prophet it's it's a slogan that people are chant they regularly chant in
9:35the religious ceremonies and so on so it's ideologically uh humiliation is not
9:43something that they can accept but as I said even if they were to say okay for the sake of humanity we
9:50will let's say relinquish a part of our sovereignty let's say hypothetically with who who are you
9:57going to trust here you give up your sovereignty which is not just your sovereignty but it's your uh it's your
10:04it's your insurance policy and you're going to put your faith in
10:10Trump you're going to put your faith faith in the United States which is busy carrying out a holocaust in Gaza which
10:17is bombing Yemen and since it cannot bomb their and destroy their military targets they're destroying the public
10:25water reservoirs in Yemen you want to trust the United
10:31States what fool would do that obama did not abide by his own
10:38commitments why would Trump of all people abide by his commitments so there's no one to
10:44negotiate with in Washington so ideologically speaking
10:51character-wise it doesn't make sense to us practically speaking it doesn't make
10:57sense and it's our it's our insurance policy what it's our defense capability
11:03if we don't have the ability to defend themselves the neocons would come in
11:09tomorrow but I don't think the Americans can win that war a conventional war i
11:14you know Scott Ritter has spoken about nuclear annihilation by basically saying
11:20that the United States is so sinister and so evil which I agree it is utterly sinister and evil it it has the same
11:27murderous uh culture uh but much more hypocrisy
11:33much more hypocrisy the west kills and then it they expect you to res to they
11:39expect you to thank them and to acknowledge their moral
11:44superiority at least Saddam Hussein didn't do that at least uh these
11:49Zionists and these these Nazis and these uh you know despots across the world and
11:57the past weren't so you know weren't so
12:02arrogant they just killed but anyway
12:08um if if the United States was to use a nuclear weapon first of all they cannot
12:13they cannot prevent Iran from firing hundreds hundreds of thousands of missiles and drones uh from their many
12:22underground missile and drone drone bases across the country as targets
12:27across the region and especially Iran's drone capabilities remember the Iranian
12:32missiles that were fired at Israel the Israeli regime the Israelis couldn't stop them nor could the Americans when the
12:39Iranians fired at the them at the al-Assad base but Iranian
12:45drones I mean they could take out everything in the Persian Gulf
12:50region and they're hundreds of thousands and it's not they're not you know the these these potential targets
12:57are not far away they're not hundreds of kilometers away they're very
13:02close so the Americans they won't be able to stop them that would a war in the Persian Gulf would mean the end of
13:09the global economy and again this goes back to something that Scott said in one of his Twitter tweets that uh well
13:17America is self-sufficient no America the American consumer is completely
13:23dependent on energy cheap energy if the price of oil goes to $500 a
13:33barrel sure some people are going to get c super rich but the consumer is going
13:39to be crushed
13:44electricity gasoline anything that has to do with energy it will shut
13:50down businesses factories it will people won't be able
13:56to sustain themselves anymore it would it would be ruinous for the world and then you'd have tens if not hundreds of
14:04millions of people on the move if Trump is and his supporters are unhappy about
14:10the number of as they say illegals or refugees pouring into the United States
14:15from the southern border imagine what it's going to look like when the global economy collapses and the same is true
14:20with Europe so it's not a situation that the Americans can
14:26win and uh the isolation that would come about through a nuclear attack i mean
14:32just look right now with the tariffs the world is outraged you see the Chinese and the Japanese and the
14:40Koreans how they are talking and trying to coordinate with one another these
14:47three countries have very poor relations with each other but Trump has succeeded to bring them together just like Trump
14:54has brought Russia and Iran and China together it's bringing it's he's isolating the the the global majority or
15:02he's isolating the United States from the global majority so a nuclear weapon would totally destroy anything any
15:09credibility that the United States has uh I mean it would be the world would
15:15turn against it uh utterly but um but
15:20still they would not win so I don't think this is a winnable
15:25war so and based on logic I don't think there will be a war based on
15:30logic but uh the United States is not a logical regime the United States is a
15:36very arrogant emotional angry regime and this is not new it's always been like that it
15:44sees itself as exceptional and superior to the rest of the world so we can't expect logic and
15:51reason so that's there's that element too and the Zionists and the United
15:56States at the Zionist lobby they are pushing for war they need war it's not
16:02good for the Israeli regime war none of these wars have been
16:07but Netanyahu and his fanatical Zionist supporters all Zionists are fanatical
16:13but anyway those very fanatical right-wingers with him they they need
16:19this war so they will push for the war but I think I'm sure that there are many people in the military in the United
16:24States who know that the United States will not win a war against Iran and they don't want war and that's where things
16:30stand so at the moment I think the calculation in Tehran is that there won't be war but they are preparing for
16:37they're preparing themselves as if war is inevitable there's B2 bombers on Diego Garcia 30% of the US bomber fleet
16:45uh these have a heavy payload and the understanding here is that United States
16:50at least is threatening to essentially bomb Iran into the stone age however
16:57Iran has its own capabilities that you just outlined which then leads to the scenario of the nuclear question would
17:03the United States be able to endure this kind of uh military quagmire leading it
17:08to maybe press this nuclear button then leading to nuclear proliferation and the like is Iran capable of withstanding and
17:17defending itself from what the US is already sending uh Iran's way i think it
17:23would be far more than just US influence in the region i think it would really change the world in a in a way which
17:29would uh be unim in a way in which we really can't imagine and the United
17:34States uh would never recover from it uh I think it's just a the final red line
17:41that would be crossed and uh the the madness of Christian Zionists
17:49who who believe that Christ supports genocide uh the madness of the people in
17:55this cult will no longer be able to carry the United States on the fan
18:00fanatics in power um I the world will turn against the United States in a way
18:05in which I think is just incomparable to what we have today but uh but in addition to that the
18:13United States you know you actually mentioned a couple of things a couple good footnotes actually come out of this one is the USS Vincent do you know
18:20anything about the ship i I'm sure you do just a little but I'll leave it to you
18:26it was the ship that it was the ship that downed an Iranian airline and murdering 291 people in the Persian Gulf
18:34in 1988 and the United States refuses refused until today to apologize for it
18:40so they they murdered 291 I think people uh I think that's the exact number uh
18:47and they lied about it in the UN security council uh back then Bush the
18:54father was the vice president he said I will never apologize and I think he went
19:00in the UN security council and said the the the airline the it was an Iran air
19:06plane it was moving towards the Vincent the pilot was saying we're going to do kill you it was not in the international
19:13corridor all of these were lies it was just an ordinary plane flying within
19:18that corridor going to Dubai carrying ordinary Iranians and they
19:24massacred so the USS Vincson has you know it Iranians have memories of that
19:32ship i think probably if there's war one of the first ships to be uh found at the bottom of the Persian Gulf or the Indian
19:40Ocean or the Red Sea will be the Vincent but um and we have to keep in mind that
19:48uh Iranian anti-ship missiles I know that they have a range of at least 2,200
19:55km 2,2,200 km i don't know if there if it goes more than that but uh the the
20:02United States would be vulnerable in the Red Sea they would be vulnerable in the Indian Ocean in the Eastern
20:09Mediterranean uh I mean look they can't defeat the They cannot defeat Ansar they
20:15cannot defeat Yemen they're bombing their water uh reserv uh you know their
20:22water assets they're they're they're bombing they're trying to deprive people of water why because they can't defeat
20:28them militarily they're striking civilian targets we all know that that's how inhumane they are but it shows that
20:34they can't beat them and is still firing missiles and drones and that's why the
20:40US aircraft carrier is in the north of the Persian Gulf and that's why they need a second carrier group now because
20:46they're running out of missiles to to to to bring down the drones and
20:52missiles very expensive drones and miss uh missiles uh anti- missile missiles very expensive
21:01so Anar is fighting firing high techch but cheap weapons and Americans are
21:08spending billions of dollars keeping those ships there and firing missiles to bring down these cheap
21:14drones it's not a success and Iran is infinitely more powerful than
21:21Yemen iran has been preparing itself for 20 years now and all of these regimes in
21:27the Persian Gulf they're a bunch of um glass palacists i mean
21:34if if the Americans really want to fight against Iran if I was in the Emirates or
21:41Bahrain or Kuwait or Gata or Saudi I'd lead
21:47now because they won't survive these are just tiny they're not even
21:55countries so and then imagine what would happen to the global
22:01economy so I don't I don't I I don't see how the Americans and if the Americans
22:07want to bomb Iran they're probably going to have to do it from Diego
22:14Garcia and that would be 5,000 km if I'm not mistaken it's not easy and Iran has
22:22a very powerful um air defense
22:27system now the Israelis can pretend that they destroyed it but if they had destroyed it they'd be bombing us every
22:32day i mean it's not as if the Israelis are shy about bombing countries go ask the
22:38Syrians go ask the Gazins the Palestinians if they could they
22:44would so and B-52s and B2s are you know if if if one of them are
22:51down then they are big targets and I don't think it'll be easy to have
22:58um uh escorts for them because the distance is so far it's going to be very
23:04difficult for the United States to carry out air strikes against Iran in other words and Iran has good air defense
23:11systems as I said but more importantly Iran's offensive capabilities are
23:16enormous and the region as I said before is full of glass
23:22palaces that's not going to end well for the United States it's not going to end well for anyone so again I I think that
23:29Iran has established a balance of terror but that means which means that
23:35basically in war everyone loses iran does not want war but Iran has prepared itself in a
23:42way in which it would ensure that the Americans would not win one final point and that is what Dr
23:50jani said a couple of days ago which is important and that is that he said on television that if the United States
23:55attacks Iran's nuclear facilities we will develop a nuclear weapon that was implied earlier by Dr
24:03kari who is another adviser to the leader but he didn't say it that way he
24:08said that Iran would uh what was it um I keep forgetting it would change its
24:14nuclear posture that's not what Dr he said he said we'll make a we'll make a we'll be forced to make a nuclear
24:19weapon we will make a nuclear weapon he says we don't want
24:26to and there are reasons for that but we will if that's if the United States attacks
24:32two other one one other thing that he said that didn't get noticed that much was that he said we have prepared
24:40ourselves for such a scenario and therefore if the United States attack
24:46peaceful nuclear program we won't be set back implying that we will be able to
24:53make a make nuclear weapons very swiftly with or without
24:59uh an attack now how is that how is that the case that's not for me to say but he's
25:07saying that rest assured we will have nuclear weapons and Iran of course has a very
25:13formidable missile defense and offensive capabilities so Iran and you know in
25:19today's world with AI and with a new technology you don't have to blow
25:25explode a nuclear weapon or nuclear device to test it simil with simulations
25:31simulations today can be done very easily so for Iran it's it's very simple
25:38but Iran doesn't want a nuclear weapon for two reasons what is ideological iran
25:43is against nuclear weapons during the Iran Iraq war when Saddam Hussein with Western support was
25:51using chemical weapons against his against Iranians and his own people and as you know I survived two chemical
25:58attacks in uh 1988 mustard gas and in 1984 a u a nerve
26:06agent and others didn't survive and others there many who are still dying slowly it's a very it can be a very slow
26:13death very very painful death that goes can go on for decades
26:19but um um senior officials went to see the
26:24leader and said we we shouldn't make chemical weapons and we have the capability and he said no it's a horrible weapon we shouldn't use it and
26:31another interesting point is that while we were uh the these civilized Europeans
26:36and these civilized North Americans were giving Saddam Hussein their buddy their ally back then chemical weapons and the
26:43political cover to use them and the military intelligence to use them they were also preventing Iran from
26:49purchasing gas masks that's how the west that's you
26:54know that's how civilized there so but Iran did not produce chemical weapons
27:01so when there is a fatwa uh they have to take it seriously
27:07in in Shia Islam they have to take it very seriously it's a moral issue
27:13however under circumstances extreme circumstances that
27:18can be reversed if the national if the nation's existence is at
27:24risk then circumstances change the second reason why Iran does not wants a
27:30nuclear weapon is that a nuclear weapon destabilizes the region you have Central Asia you have the Caucuses you have West
27:36Asia you have the subcontinent you have all these countries in the region
27:43big and small some of them family dictatorships some of them
27:48unstable you don't want an incentive for other countries to start developing nuclear weapons but it's not in Iran's
27:54interest to have it but Iran has that capability it is a
28:01threshold state why because the Americans have already threatened Iran with nuclear
28:07weapons hillary Clinton once threatened Iran one that a threat that I remember
28:13uh a previous French I'm not sure if it was Shira or if it
28:20was anyway uh uh or it was Mitan one of them
28:28threatened Iran with a nuclear weapon indirectly or in a subtle way and
28:33of course the Israelis are constantly threatening just during this holocaust one a government minister early on
28:38threatened the gazins with a nuclear weapon and Netanyahu on numerous occasions would go to their nuclear site
28:45and make threats to Iran which basically was clear what he was saying so being a
28:50threshold state gives you that security and Dr says that Iran if there if there is an attack Iran
28:58can swiftly make a so that is I think another incentive for the Americans not
29:05to behave stupidly if they don't want Iran to make a nuclear weapon then don't fight don't
29:11do anything stupid because Iran doesn't have an interest in having a nuclear weapon itself now to those many and many
29:19people are now saying Iran should have a nuclear weapon many across the world you'd be I mean you I mean I know you
29:26know but Iran is very popular nowadays across the world despite decades of uh
29:32misinformation and disinformation coming from the west and the region these Arab dictatorships they've been promoting
29:39sectarianism and and racial hatred for for many years
29:47uh to Saudi all these different Saudi TV stations
29:52deeply sectarian really filthy stuff for for many years and u the the west of course um
30:02anti-Iranian uh but despite all that today Iran has become very popular and
30:07people across the world are pushing and saying or you know some attacking me and saying why don't you build a weapon as
30:13if like I'm uh you know as if I'm in charge or I I'm in I have not you know as if I'm the one who decides what to do
30:20with Iran's nuclear program or others attack me or criticize me or push me to
30:25you know carry out true promise three as if I'm the guy who presses the button but the point is that a lot of people
30:32are looking to Iran now across the world it's amazing it's
30:38extraordinary how all decades of anti-Iranian propaganda have just melted
30:45away and anti-resistance and anti- Hezbollah and anti- Ansar and anti
30:51uh Hamas and Islamic Jihad and Iraqi popular mobilization for all that has
30:57melted away of course they're still trying you see these uh sectarian fanatics who still support ISIS and
31:03al-Qaeda and these uh and these people who are getting money from these oil and
31:09gas rich regimes uh or from Erdogan or someone you know these sort of people or
31:14the west USA and NE or whatever's replaced them uh that they still do
31:22their best to demonize and to antagonize Iran but um there are lots of people who say Iran
31:29should have a nuclear weapon and I think probably now the majority of Iranians believe we should have a nuclear weapon
31:35i haven't seen any the latest polls uh but the you know before it used to be somewhat evenly split i still believe
31:43that where we stand I think that large the position that Dr lari announced is a
31:49good one because I think that nuclear weapons is not a good thing and if possible if
31:57we don't have them if we don't need to have them so much the better but Iran is
32:04can can is can do it at whenever it wants and uh I think that creates an
32:12incentive for the Americans to think twice before being stupid although they can although the mechans are still