seen from China
seen from Türkiye
seen from Morocco
seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from France
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from Yemen
seen from Türkiye
seen from Singapore
seen from United States
seen from South Korea
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Canada
seen from United States
seen from United States
Do you have any tips/sources/suggestions for someone who might want to write a novel in the form of interviews? Akin to the style of "World War Z" by Max Brooks.
I think the most important thing for you to do is to make sure the story flows through the interviews.
Here's a source for a basic interview format that I've seen a lot in novels:
HERE
Hope that helps some :)
-H
How is it sexist to insist people, regardless of gender, are truthful with you. That's what I expect from everyone. I don't really see the issue with that. I also expect explanations from everyone, and that they be truthful. You might call that naive, but if everyone was honest with everyone else, the world would be better.
Yes or no. If you answer with the cat again, or just try and dodge the issue some, I think it's fair to infer your surrender and that there is a very strong possibility that you're wrong. Isn't it better to drop the high horse act and admit it, rather than be childish about it. I agree with you that there's a possibility the guy was a sexist, but do you not see my point about him not necessarily being one, and that as a result, beating down on him in the way you did was unnecessary?
Infer whatever the fuck you want, if you haven't noticed, I really don't care about your opinions either way.
And let's try a different question, relating to what the anon said. Why is it sexist to say that there is a possibility that the woman this guy talked to lied? In what way is that sexist?
Random pictures of very cold cats don't answer questions. So are you going to continue dodging? Because I got to tell you, when other people do that, it really doesn't work out well for anyone believing what they have to say.
The fact that you refuse to answer the question is only further demonstrating the liklyhood that you are wrong. A simple yes or know. Is there any possibility that you've made a mistake in this instance? Or do you really believe that you are 100% right, and there is no way at all that you somehow stuffed gender politics into a situation that did not call for it.
Hypocrite. You bash someone to pieces of FB, and then can't take it when someone calls you out on the possibility, that maybe, just maybe, you've made a mistake. Answer the question. Isn't it possible, just possible, that you made a mistake, and actually, the guy is not a sexist, and he's just upset about the possibility that he's been lied to by someone he was close to. And isn't it also possible that being upset about being lied to isn't the same as calling into question someone's right to lie
Once again, just the fact that you want an answer doesn't entitle you to one. I have no intention of providing you with one, either, mostly because I've explained this a billion times before and don't feel like doing it again now.
1) Calm down. He's not questioning her right to lie. He's questioning that its a good thing to do. And it's not good. 2) He wasn't necessary being a sexist. He might just have been upset about the lying. Which is fair. 3) It is a public beat down, because it's on facebook you did this. Right in front of all of his friends. Don't you think that because you might have him figured wrong, you need to stop acting like you know everything.
GO.
AWAY.
