The Rush Fish-Eye Lens: Assuming Control
Many works of art enjoying sustained appreciation often contain multiple layers of understanding that may invite/require frequent revisits to reach full comprehension of the creator’s intent. These works can operate successfully on each level independently and thus serve many purposes. In contrast, other works in service to commerce often are created to have maximum impact in the present, and are resigned to a limited shelf life. While all music has a purpose, it is also true that creative aims are not monolithic, but instead exist somewhere on a wide spectrum. This can create conflict if the artist(s) are contractually bound to a larger network supporting the endeavor. An issue of who is controlling the content emerges and the resulting products can be a reflection of the dynamics of this network.
At the time that the Canadian power trio, Rush, was finishing a lackluster tour promoting the weak commercial performance of their third album, Caress of Steel, there were many major cultural shifts underway setting the stage for a broader cultural war; one, it can be argued, that is still being waged. 1976 was the bicentennial celebration of the American Revolution, and in many respects the original revolutionary tenet of “the individual vs. the machine” was very much on people’s minds two hundred years later. Ascendant were conversations about feminist and gender equality, environmental concerns, influence of the Evangelical community, stirring of Islamic politics, racial and ethnic identity, and resistance to the heavy-handedness of corporations directing the entertainment industry.
Artists of this time played the role of vox populi, and groups such as Queen and Kiss penned a number of anthems to stir large arenas into unified chants channeling revolutionary fervor to oppose conventionality. The English band, Pink Floyd, utilized a vehicle of musical commentary through their string of influential concept albums. Their Wish You Were Here album from 1975 describes the band's disillusionment with the music industry as a moneymaking machine rather than a forum of artistic expression. The plot features an aspiring musician getting signed by a seedy executive to the music industry, "The Machine". Dystopian settings were in vogue in all areas of art expressing anxiety of the influence of technology, religion, ideology, and other agents of conformity.
It was at this time that Rush, supported by Mercury Records, arrived at a directional crossroad preparing for their fourth recording project. Rush manager Ray Danniels received pressure from Mercury to see that Rush’s next project be commercially accessible, or they would be dropped from the company. Rush’s recalcitrant answer to the label’s ultimatum was to maintain artistic integrity and stay the course. What resulted from their own act of insubordination was THE bull’s eye strike that earned them the permanent license to control their aesthetic vision. This project given the title, 2112, repurposed Ayn Rand’s Anthem (1937) novella, with additional inspiration from Samuel R. Delany’s Babel-17 (1966) and Nova (1967). Rush’s resistance to massification resonated with their audience profoundly, and they would maintain elements of their resistance throughout the remainder of their work together.
The mini-opera that comprises the entire first side of this album tells the cautionary story of a theocratic regime that has gained total control of the inhabitants of Megadon in the year 2112 and has instituted a collectivist state depriving the population of individual identity and artistic expression. By chance, a guitar is discovered in a cavern behind a waterfall by an anonymous escapee. Determining that introducing this obsolete, primitive technology might enrich their society, the protagonist presents it to the autocratic Priests, who summarily ridicule him and dismiss the idea as unproductive and dangerous. Throughout the entire suite, Rush invokes the combative 1812 Overture (1880) by Peter Tchaikovsky, the Gospel of Matthew, and even G.W.F. Hegel’s “unhappy consciousness” and “beautiful soul” from The Phenomenology of Spirit (1807) in the masterwork. The second side of the album, although not a part of the “2112” suite, continues the thematic motifs describing the traveling to internal and external places and discovering transformative ideas.
This music IS multi-layered and overtly critical of the collectivist ideology. Graphic designer Hugh Syme’s depiction of The Starman on the album cover also underscored the battle waged by “the individual” that was so much a part of the Boomer raison d’être. This material was criticized by leftist journalist, Barry Miles in the March 4, 1978 article in the New Musical Express calling Rush “right-wing propagandists” and even equated them with Nazis (“shades of the 1000-year Reich”). Nonetheless, their following was secured and they would remain in the domain of The Starman, resist pressure to compromise their principles, and steadfastly offer their unique perspective on life.












