seen from Spain
seen from United States
seen from Australia
seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from Thailand
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Malaysia
seen from United Kingdom
seen from China
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Netherlands
seen from Malaysia
seen from Germany
seen from China
seen from Germany
seen from Suriname
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Suriname
“90% of confidence people don’t know if it’s real or not.” - @maddyperezxo #ootd #euphoria #nondesigner #butters #timbs #nyc #decibel #yankees #rolex #fashion (at New York City, N.Y.) https://www.instagram.com/p/CaPi1jGLSVG/?utm_medium=tumblr
Typeface vs Font.................... to a Non-Designer
Explaining typefaces vs fonts to a non-designer.
General exposure to the word “font” is that of the Word Processing drop down font menu. With this perception that the “font” holds the style and additional options of Italic, Bold, and Capitals. While designers know that the style of the characters are built in by the Typeface and the font is a resulting set of characters derived from that style. Common derivations of English (Latin-English most commonly) words however would suggest a type “face” would be the visual result of this style. Each character literally being a face of the designed style. While we know this not to be the case, it does seem a reasonable explanation.
Explaining the concept is that a typeface is that of the signature or style and that a font is the character set that is visually presented and chosen.
In a blog called NERDPLUSART they put it eloquently by analogy,
“I think it's easiest to understand the difference by analogy: a typeface is like a song and a font is like a recording. One is the definition, the other is an instance. One is a concept, the other a manifestation.” - http://nerdplusart.com/type-terminology-smackdown/
My day
Today I bought some bright colored chiffons and I'm going to build a Spring wardrobe from them. -the fake designer in me
