Ham repeatedly said that you cant prove things already in the past... Without witnessing it. Ok then prove that that "ONE BOOK", that has been mistranslated and changed plenty of times, is reliable. Ok then prove that you were a WITNESS of Noah's ark. That you knew Adam and Eve. Technically, you, yourself would have to be Adam himself to fulfill your requirement of being there and witnessing the event for it to be true. Please. P R O V E I T. Please tell us. Hand over the historical and scientific evidence. Why why why do you find the need to think that you can tell Bill Nye that scientific research and evidence is not real proof of his argument when there is little to NO evidence that your basing is reliable or even true. Where is the logic