#nse co-location

[captainmaya12]

NSE Co-location Matter Prohibited Period Finished

As indicated by the SAT Choice, NSE Co-location Matter Was Understood: On Dec 4, 2019, a charge guaranteed on the NSE Co-location process in SAT (Security Appellate Tribunal). The co-area process implies, the advertiser or merchants having need in the Bourse exchanging framework. The NSE, primary administrators in pres

[abhishekchoudry1-blog]

SEBI’s TAC proved wrong!

The TAC or Technical Advisory Committee is mostly appointed by Indian securities market SEBI and has nailed the wrongdoing in the controversial news related to NSE, as mentioned by E&Y in the revised report. The committee also rapped the findings of E&Y for the failure of the forensic firm to draw some conclusions associated with the NSE co-location scam.

This meeting was held in the year 2018 June. In this meeting, TAC pointed out how in 2014 some of the brokers were allowed to log into co-location consistently and into the servers ahead of others. This segment led to the breakdown in the system and further processing lack at NSE.

Examine the architecture of NSE:

The first point was associated with the examination of whether the NSE’s TBT data dissemination architecture was prone to the alleged market abuse and manipulation.

Understanding preferential access:

The meeting further determines whether some of the members were actually given the access to the backup servers and did this give undue advantage to them. It was noted by the committee that E&Y observed that NSE did not give any defined policies for secondary server access and did not have any documented procedure or policy for reprimanding members connecting to the secondary servers.

Point on all the members:

It is important for you to know that not all the members who were connecting to the secondary servers were reprimanded by NSE. Some of them were reprimanded with a light warning, according to the SEBI’s TAC report. Here, the committee as clever enough to conclude that some of the trading members were surely given such preferential access to just backup services at NSE.

It was further noted by the committee that all trading members had unlimited access to the backup servers, it was later asserted by SEBI’s TAC that secondary servers got the ticks last, so where is the question of any advantage or material gain?

Source:  Did early login help in NSE TBT architecture?

[abhishekchoudry1-blog]

NSE Co-location – It All Started With the Trading Laboratory

The much awaited and famous NSE Trading Laboratory is one such platform which came handy with 34 trading terminals with the aim of offering users with the professional real time trading experience, live. It forms a major part of the NSE colocation category and widely used by the brokers to gain better response in the stock market field.

More about the news:

The Indian School of Business or ISB made teamed up with the National Stock Exchange few years back in 2014 for creating trading laboratory. It was designed to provide access to some of the premium financial database for equipping the management students with the required knowledge and skills. It was used for understanding the nuances revolving around the world of financial markets and challenges of the said fast changing economy.

The NSE ISB based trading laboratory came handy with 34 terminals for trading.

The main aim over here is to provide the users with the live trading experience under professional real time.

Furthermore, the trading laboratory under NSE co-location was designed to provide access to brokers to databases like Thomson Reuters, Bloomberg, S&P Capital IQ, Morningstar, Wharton Research Data Services and CRSP.

During the inauguration time:

The laboratory under NSE co-location was inaugurated by the former NSE managing director and even the chief executive officer Chitra Ramakrishna. The exchange though that this partnership will help in leveraging strengths to create one such major investment lab. This form of investment lab came into consideration to help intermediaries, investors and even students to understand the importance associated with asset allocation. It will further help in dealing with the risk management and financial planning among the investors and students through some of the meaningful research, case studies and working papers on the said market.

Present day academia:

when the lab was first inaugurated for the NSE co-location services, the ISB dean viewed that the present day industry and academia in India primarily operated in almost mutually exclusive and two independent spheres in area of capital markets and finance.

It was stated that such a scenario will not only just deprive students of the opportunity to understand and learn from the real world based applications, but might further deprive the industry from procuring some top notch research emanating from the educational field. This preferred association between the ISB and NSE was noted to be one ambitious attempt to fill up the gaps.

Proposals as made by ISB:

For the upcoming trading lab, ISB preferably proposed to collaborate academic excellence under the fields of asset management, accounting, psychology, behavioral finance, value investing, private equity and trading strategies.

It was a great initiative under by NSE and later form a significant part of the colocation scam. To learn more about the scandal and the present standing scenario, it is vital to follow the courses from SEBI and get right into details on the same notes.

Source: NSE Co-location

[abhishekchoudry1-blog]

NSE Co-location Issue : NSE Submits E&Y Reports To SEBI

It was right at the starting of 2018 in the month of January, when the National Stock Exchange submitted the forensic audit report on one fine Tuesday. The report was mainly associated with the co-location issue and it was part of the NSE colocation scam. This report was freshly prepared at that time by forensic auditors E&Y and presented to SEBI.

There was a press release at that time the case and the scandal in complete details. As mentioned in that press release, the bourse clearly stated that it has also at that time, submitted study conducted by ISB for determining whether some of the brokers at NSE have made any unfair profits.

PC: Economic Times

Some areas of the case as covered by E&Y:

According to E&Y, the report as presented was designed to cover the currency derivatives, cash and even the interest rate based future markets.

E&Y in its forensic audit report stated that there was no way a member can gain materially with help of preferential access.

Heading towards the colocation issue even more:

The purpose of colocation, was mainly designed to allow not just some of the brokers but even some institutional traders to purchase rack space. This space is likely to be closer to the present exchange servers.

E&Y in its report submitted to SEBI that one could not be advantaged by means of preferential access or logging in early which were the prime allegations of the NSE colocation scam.

The time of the episode:

This current episode of the alleged unfair access was mainly noted to have taken place between 2012 and 2014. Right from that time, the exchange has changed the system at colocation facility. This step was taken upon receiving various complaints from a whistle blower, talking about some brokers gaming the system.

Source: Timelines of the NSE Co-location Controversy

NSE Submits EY Forensic Audit Report on Co-location with SEBI

[abhishekchoudry1-blog]

Resignations at NSE Following the NSE Colocation Scam

It was by The Economic Times, which first reported that on 22nd May 2017, SEBI came up with the show cause notices to the exchange and even to 14 individuals, which included the former managing directors as well, namely the Ravi Narain and Chitra Ramakrishna.

They were known to be a part of the NSE co-location allegations. Notices were sent to Ravi Narain, who was the vice chairman and CEO of the exchange at the time when the alleged violations were first notified.

Other names as involved:

Apart from the main two names as mentioned, some of the other names of the officials included in this section were Ravi Varanasi, who was chief of the business development department of NSE and was also leading the surveillance department of said exchange at this point of time.

Then you have Suprabhat Lala, who was the regulation chief and further the head of trading division during the period of 2010 and 2013.

Some of the other officials in this regard who received such show cause notices were former technology heads namely Umesh Jain and Ravi Apte. Then you have the former CEO Subramanian Anand.

The vice chairman of NSE, Ravi Narain has stated in papers on 2nd June 2017 amid the regulators intensifying the probe into lapses in the said high frequency trading.

In the year 2016 December, the MD and CEO Chitra Ramakrishna resigned. According to the media reports, Chitra’s resignation was mainly the result of two government related issues at NSE. One was mainly the loss of confidence in top NSE management because of the NSE colocation controversy. And another reason was the controversy revolving around high ranking NSE official Anand Subramanian, who resigned on 1st April 2015 as Group Operating Officer and Advisor to MD.

This appointment mainly took place after the communication from MD, NSE and EO offices bypassing the HR department. Some of the complaints regarding such appointments along with the high salary package of Subramanian reached broad promoting it to further examine the appointment based procedure in this regard. This stage later led to the resignation of Subramanian from office at October 2016. Both of them were major structural founders of the NSE team.

After the cause notices:

Upon receiving the SEBI’s show cause notice, around 12 out of 14 high profile former and current executives of the NSE, along with Chitra Ramakrishna and Ravi Narain filed application with SEBI. The application was talking about the settlement of the NSE colocation issue in July 2017 under consent mechanism. This is a procedure of alternative dispute resolution, allowing the wrongdoer to settle pending issue by accepting penal action without denying or admitting the guilt.

At this point, Vikram Limaye took charge as CEO and MD of NSE. He provided assurances that he will be the one approaching SEBI for settlement of NSE colocation and find underlying cause behind it. But, a consent application was later returned in March 2018 after CBI came into force.

Source: Economics Times

[abhishekchoudry1-blog]

Background and Details Revolving Around NSE Colocation

The current and indeed well-known NSE colocation scam relates to the alleged market manipulation at NSE of India. It has been alleged that some of the selected players procured market price info before the rest of market to help them front run the market.

A brief note on the alleged market fraud:

This is as an alleged multi dollar market fraud, which was later proved wrong, came into limelight when the regulator of the markets, SEBI, started receiving anonymous complaints in January 2015 from a whistle blower.

In the letter, it was alleged that the trading members were given the opportunity to capitalize on the advanced colluding knowledge with some of the officials in the exchange department.

The overall default rate of the NSE high frequency trading is stated to be very less in the Indian HFT market. This co-location case is well under investigation by the CBI, SEBI and even the IT department.

All the allegations were later proved to be wrong and illegitimate by various forensic audit reports.

Let us learn more about the colocation facility:

It was in the year 2010 January when NSE first started offering the intelligent co-location facility to the members, which is the beginning of the NSE colocation facility.

Colocation is the facility where the members are given the chance to place their servers in premises of the exchange in return for a selected fee.

This gave them the opportunity to access faster for buying and selling orders after being disseminated by the trading engine of the exchange.

Co-location actually means a proficient setup where the broker’s computer is mainly located in same area as the server of the stock exchange.

Even the retail investors were given the chance to monitor prices as subject to delay when compared to tick by tick data broadcast, which otherwise the user receives in any of the co-location facility.