#ntvic

[vgprintads]

‘Crazyland’ [aka, ‘The Trolls in Crazyland’]

[NES] [USA] [MAGAZINE] [1991]

Electronic Gaming Monthly, October 1991 (#27)

Scanned by Sean697, via RetroMags

[gamespite]

Power Missiøn

Power Missiøn: Video, script, release data, packaging photos, and manual scans.

Power Missiøn

Japanese Title: パワーミッション Developer: Graphic Research Publisher: VAP [JP] NTVIC [U.S.] Release date: 8.24.1990 [JP] Genre: Strategy (Turn-based, Military) Super Game Boy: No enhancements Previous in series: None Next in series: None Similar titles: Battleship [Use/Mindscape, 1989], Radar Mission [Nintendo, 1990]

About the game

View On WordPress

[snesaday]

Approximate Release Date: October 15, 1992 Genre: Scrolling shooter Developer: Athena Publisher: NTVIC

Good ideas can’t rescue Strike Gunner S.T.G. from poor execution.

How long should a level last in a scrolling shooter? The question applies to any level-based game, really. When I started playing Strike Gunner S.T.G., I thought the first level was way too long. The same awful forest background kept scrolling and I felt intensely bored. Once the stage complete screen appeared, I thought the first level took me between 10 and 12 minutes. I was prepared to open up today’s post and lambasting this game for featuring such absurdly long, boring levels.

Luckily, I was wrong. It actually took about 5 minutes. Oof. That’s a completely different problem.

So why does time slow down when I play Strike Gunner S.T.G.? I think the biggest culprit is how the backgrounds are terrible in all respects, especially how slow it scrolls. For a game where you’re flying a jet fighter, it sure doesn’t feel like you have a decent amount of speed. Enemies show up in predictable patterns, too, and generally won’t shoot at you until you’ve had a chance to shoot them down first. This is the rare game that I would encourage bumping up the difficulty a bit.

To be fair, the later levels of Strike Gunner S.T.G. that I played were less boring because they were more difficult. But the same issues still existed. There are only two different backgrounds in the first three levels! That is stunning and makes the game feel stretched too thin. Each level introduces some new enemy types, but the majority of bad guys are still the same helicopters and jets from the first level.

It’s too bad, because I like some parts of this game quite a bit. First, there’s some really good music playing in the background, the kind of butt-rock style video game music that is perfect for blasting waves of enemies to. The other interesting twist is Strike Gunner S.T.G.‘s special weapon system. Before every level, you get to choose between one of 15 different weapons, but you can only use one weapon for one level. Once you finish the stage, that weapon can’t be used again. This prevents you from just using the most powerful weapons for every stage and encourages experimentation. Every weapon seemed standard, though, and I would have liked to see some more interesting choices.

But still, there are much better scrolling shooters to play than Strike Gunner S.T.G.

Tomorrow: Randomly capitalized letters in game names rarely bodes well, but I’ll give BlaZeon: The Bio-Cyborg Challenge a fair shot.

SNES A Day 102: Strike Gunner S.T.G. Approximate Release Date: October 15, 1992 Genre: Scrolling shooter Developer: Athena Publisher: NTVIC Good ideas can't rescue…

[snesaday]

Approximate Release Date: October 1, 1992 Genre: Action/puzzle Developer: Realtime Associates Publisher: NTVIC

The animated backgrounds in Q*bert 3 are so bad the developers put a switch in the options screen to disable them.

They’re headache inducing. I don’t know why the developers of Q*bert 3 decided to put these awful, amateurish backgrounds in the game. I don’t know who would even think these were acceptable to be seen by the public in any context, much less one that asks people to spend $50 for the pleasure of being subjected to this unpleasantness.

You know what it reminds me of? Geocities circa 1998. Low-effort tiled shapes endlessly animating and looking terrible. Just watch Q*bert 3 being played. The backgrounds are distracting! And the game over screen is truly something to behold.

I’m harping on the backgrounds for two reasons.

These are shockingly bad.

I have little else to say about Q*bert 3.

Q*bert 3 is just Q*bert. There are different levels here, and Wikipedia says there are new enemies. Great. I don’t like Q*bert very much in the first place, so this isn’t a very interesting or appealing game for me.

If you don’t know what Q*bert is, well, that means you haven’t seen seen Wreck-It Ralph and you should definitely do that instead of playing Q*bert 3. This is a simple puzzle game where by jumping on blocks you change their color, and your goal is to change all the blocks to the same color. And there are enemies to dodge.

Q*bert 3 isn’t a lazy sequel like Paperboy 2 was. If you’re really into Q*bert, this is more of what you want and it’s functional. The only complaint I have can be disabled in the options menu. I just don’t @!#?@!ing like Q*bert.

Tomorrow: I wonder what Race Drivin’ is about. Cooking?

SNES A Day 95: Q*bert 3 Approximate Release Date: October 1, 1992 Genre: Action/puzzle Developer: Realtime Associates Publisher: NTVIC The animated backgrounds in…